- Feb 22, 2017
- 1,079
- 817
- 35
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Are hypocrisy, judgment, and condemnation the cause of divisons? Jesus said not to lord authority over one another to the disciples. Also he said where two, three or more of them in agreement he would be there. In the Gospel there's more sayings of his about judgment like taking the plank out of your own eye first. Another is not to judge as the judgment we use is how we'll be judged.
In Acts the Apostles authority was as the Church according to Christ. Even those who lead weren't perfect; Peter had denied Jesus three times, Paul had persecuted the Church, and James supposedly his brother accepted him after his death. Then the inclusion of the Gentiles involved Paul who was an Apostle to the Gentiles, James who was a leader of the Jewish believers (Jerusalem church), and Peter who was the Apostle chosen to shepherd/father the Church.
All these different people and places yet they were united under one faith, one Church, one Christ, and one God. I'm thinking it's the opposite of those three; humility and mercy, justice too. Peter admitted the keeping of the law was a yoke the Jews hadn't been able to burden, that is why for the Gentiles he was lenient regarding their inclusion. When Peter didn't eat with the Gentiles as he had done, separating himself sitting with other Jews, even to him Paul rebuked.
If we as Christians are under the law of Christ and not the law of Moses, does this mean our discernment should be of the Holy Spirit and not the sinful flesh? What I mean is instead of looking at God's word as a law to be enforced against sin, we look to it for raising ourselves and others in the spirit (Not saying to ignore sin being lawless against God). I'm thinking if we understood God according to the Gospel and Jesus, our discernment of His word would be character driven (values/principles) like the major three displayed by the Lord and Apostles alike.
Should this be the case for how we interpret the Bible, putting it into the context of the Gospel through Jesus and consider his motivations or intentions behind his instructions and teachings? Would this lead the modern Church to greater understanding and unity?
In Acts the Apostles authority was as the Church according to Christ. Even those who lead weren't perfect; Peter had denied Jesus three times, Paul had persecuted the Church, and James supposedly his brother accepted him after his death. Then the inclusion of the Gentiles involved Paul who was an Apostle to the Gentiles, James who was a leader of the Jewish believers (Jerusalem church), and Peter who was the Apostle chosen to shepherd/father the Church.
All these different people and places yet they were united under one faith, one Church, one Christ, and one God. I'm thinking it's the opposite of those three; humility and mercy, justice too. Peter admitted the keeping of the law was a yoke the Jews hadn't been able to burden, that is why for the Gentiles he was lenient regarding their inclusion. When Peter didn't eat with the Gentiles as he had done, separating himself sitting with other Jews, even to him Paul rebuked.
If we as Christians are under the law of Christ and not the law of Moses, does this mean our discernment should be of the Holy Spirit and not the sinful flesh? What I mean is instead of looking at God's word as a law to be enforced against sin, we look to it for raising ourselves and others in the spirit (Not saying to ignore sin being lawless against God). I'm thinking if we understood God according to the Gospel and Jesus, our discernment of His word would be character driven (values/principles) like the major three displayed by the Lord and Apostles alike.
Should this be the case for how we interpret the Bible, putting it into the context of the Gospel through Jesus and consider his motivations or intentions behind his instructions and teachings? Would this lead the modern Church to greater understanding and unity?
Last edited: