- Nov 19, 2002
- 34,112
- 7,406
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The general idea from what I've heard is that it's not deliberately changed but is a result of a subtle ripple effect.staff edit
The idea behind it I think, is that when a person travels back in time, it creates changes in that timeline. The changes are generally marginal, but as more people time travel they accumulate to the point they begin to be noticed.
I was a design engineer for 20 years. I traveled between metric and English dimensions every day.inter-dimensional travel is not only possible, but has been practiced for a long time.
Are they saying the original reports are showing deaths at the pentagon? Or that there are new reports that have been fabricated just as the rest of the govt narrative was?
I remember listening to a retired air force officer who was stationed at the Pentagon and was actually in the D ring, when the plane hit the E ring. He told of helping injured employees evacuate, and coming across dead bodies; how many? I don't remember him saying.
ETA: This was 10-11 years ago.
The "conspiracy" (this time) does not actually lie directly with the government involvement in that case. The situation is that due to temporal anomalies (i.e. someone has been messing with time,) the account from September 11, 2001 that only one woman was injured (and, maybe later died) has been changed, and now the HISTORICAL account of the event at the pentagon on 911 holds that more than 100 died.
I can say that that was ABSOLUTELY not what was reported - the first time I heard of this was when the OP posted the video. The story on 9/11 was specifically that there WOULD HAVE BEEN mass casualties IF there wasn't renovation that just so happened to be on the side of the pentagon hit.
The implications are that our reality, as we knew it, is being fundamentally changed into something else. This isn't a memory issue among millions of people around the world. It is a serious phenomenon that deserves more attention than incredulity.
Im saying if the original reports from 2001 ie. newspapers, tv reports, say pentagon employees are dead, it is something. But if its just recent reports that suggest employee deaths, then its nothing. And i was asking which case, the video here, was suggesting.
Ok. Yes, ive looked into this theory before and was fascinated for awhile until reasons in post #17.Entertain this Mandela effect philosophically.
Assume you remember from 2001 that there were reports of scores of employee deaths.
I remember from 2001 that there were NO reports of employee deaths.
Neither one of us is wrong.
How is this possible?
EDIT: I understand what you mean. The allegation is that by 2004, about 125 people died in the pentagon.
"National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States". U.S. Congress. August 21, 2004. Retrieved September 8, 2006
This did not happen in "my timeline." I, unfortunately, remember in vivid detail the last 17 years of American history because it had such a profound affect on the entire nation. And, I also keep archives of these types of events.
So, how is it possible that both of us are right? In other words, how are millions of people around the world sharing two different memories of a very pivotal event for world history?
It is not just an issue of memory.
Ok. Yes, ive looked into this theory before and was fascinated for awhile until reasons in post #17.
But i think for it to be a legitimate "effect" there would be reports from september 11, 2001-fresh off the press- reporting dead employees in the pentagon. But if its only been published in 2004 it could very likely just be somebody in the govt putting out more false information *shrug*