Great videos. I am struggling to be Catholic. Papal Infallibility seems almost impossible to prove, and detrimental to the Church. These are points to me:
1. If it was always believed, why is it not defined for 1800 years?
2. If it was always there, why was it not used to snuff out so many heresies, instead of all the councils?
3. I am told it has only been used twice, once in the 1800's, once in 1900's, to avoid historical conflict with the dogma - like Pope Honorious being condemned as a heretic by and official council, and he openly taught heresy in writing. Or the Papal Bull Unam Santacm in 1302 - no salvation unless you bow to the Pope.
4. What's the fruit of declaring Papal Infallibility - further division of the Church. That's not of the Spirit.
Will they do anything to change it - not holding my breath. It's sad - so much good in Catholicism.
