• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Lust vs. Showing Affection

Johnnz

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2004
14,082
1,003
84
New Zealand
✟119,551.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
alluredegrace said:
So, would be it pushing it too far to say that by using your heart and doing what you fell spiritually with a mate sexually is wrong?This includes trust and a strong love of a long relationship, a first for both.

Again, I was not focusing on what we do with our feelings. I believe the simple equation of arousal (an erection for a guy, identifiable physical sexual sensations for a girl) are not, in themselves 'lust'. If a guy cuddles uo with his girlfriend and then has an erection that does not mean he is suddenly lusting. He is sexually aroused, but that is all. Lust comes when arousal then leads to more specific sexual acts. Same for the girl. The desire for intimacy is not wrong either. It's just that we Christians have some real beliefs about when we should allow them to have full rein.

John
NZ
 
Upvote 0

plum

my thoughts are free
Nov 30, 2003
24,091
1,678
✟55,880.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I am not greedy because I salivate at the sight and smell of delicious food. I am not being covetous when my head is turned by someone driving a fast sports car. There is a vast difference between a reaction to something, and a wrongful indulgence of it.

To use the example of say... a very attractive person walking down the street. You see them.
The first glance may be reaction. That's fine.
The second glance... the one with emotions and imagination behind it... that is where lines get blurry.
 
Upvote 0

plum

my thoughts are free
Nov 30, 2003
24,091
1,678
✟55,880.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And to the OP:

I have not succeeded yet in LIFE with the goal of never lusting after my partner. However, this does not change my desire for a pure heart and mind or the desire to treat my SO the way I believe God directs me to.

Failure is not the point... I think intentions are the point.
 
Upvote 0

white dove

(she's a) maniac
Jan 23, 2004
24,118
2,234
Out there, livin'
✟56,857.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
horuhe00 said:
So there's nothing wrong with hugging, kissing, caressing, holding, be close to the person you love? And it could actualy be unhealthy if this isn't in a relationship?

Well...to me, I'd say that it sounds pretty unnatural not to have those things in a romantic relationship. But, there are certain limits to which Christians do these things, in order that they may not lust after their partner & think or act with an impure heart.

Also, one has to take into account that there are those people who are not necessarily as physically affectionate as other people might be...so, one needs to be sensitive of another person's needs & space; ultimately, their comfort. Physical compatibility is ideal..but spiritual compatability can supercede even the physical, at times.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 1, 2005
1,641
40
40
USA-northeast
✟2,045.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I say keep it to yourself. Also, physical affection has a major danger potential in the area of priorities. A hug is sweet. Kissing and constantly holding eachother is unnecessary in my opinion. It also can make others uncomfortable. I think this is especially true for unmarried couples. But that is just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waterbear
Upvote 0

horuhe00

Contributor
Apr 28, 2004
5,132
194
43
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Visit site
✟29,431.00
Country
Puerto Rico
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Bams481 said:
Did people in the Bible ever get married?

Funny thing... I asked myself that about a year ago.
Here's an example to answer your question: Mary was going to marry Joseph when the angel came to tell her she would have Jesus. Mary's answer was "Huh? I haven't even had sex yet!" So from that story of the Bible we get two things. First, that people get married. Second, that trying to follow the Will of God means don't have sex before geting married. :)
 
Upvote 0

Rae_Psyche

Active Member
Jul 23, 2004
61
3
40
San Juan, Puerto Rico
✟15,196.00
Faith
Christian
Imagine_your_dreams said:
I say keep it to yourself. Also, physical affection has a major danger potential in the area of priorities. A hug is sweet. Kissing and constantly holding eachother is unnecessary in my opinion. It also can make others uncomfortable. I think this is especially true for unmarried couples. But that is just my opinion.

And I agree......
 
Upvote 0

Jon_

Senior Veteran
Jan 30, 2005
2,998
91
43
California
✟26,116.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think this is a very helpful topic because there is a pretty large stigma in the church about affection vs. lust.

A lot of Christians seem to equate--as has already been pointed out--arousal with lust. This just isn't true. You can both be physically aroused without being lustful and be lustful without being physically aroused. The difference is in your intent--your heart, which God sees.

I'm a pretty passionate person when it comes to romance. I absolutely adore women, and just love to treat them well. Flowers, candy, music, theatre, fine dining, you name it. I love making them feel special. I love seeing their eyes light up, full of verve and passion. My reward is knowing that they feel special. My intent is for them to feel endeared. A lot of times, this involves romantic touching, such as holding hands, playing with her hair, running my hand over her cheek, embracing, and of course kissing. Sometimes these things arouse me. Shoot, sometimes I get aroused for no reason at all. Sometimes I put on my silk boxers and... no, I'm just kidding. ;)

The point is that God knows your intentions during these times when you are being romantic. What is our commandment in the kingdom? What is our duty here on earth? Why are we here? To glorify God. Plain and simple. How do we do that? By submitting completely and totally to His will. By committing ourselves fully to seeing it executed. Encompassed in His will are all the things that distinguish Christians.

When we embrace, caress, and kiss our endeared ones, if our intentions are to build the relationship according to God's will, we do righteousness. Seems a little funny to consider it like that. How can making out with my girlfriend be righteous? If it's God's will, then it is. Doing righteousness is simply fulfilling God's will. God didn't make us asexual creatures with unimpassioned bodies and spirits. He created us sexual creatures. We should delight in that sexuality and praise Him for it. There is an entire book of the Bible--which I just read, and will read many times again because it is just amazing--that is dedicated to romantic love: Song of Solomon. In the Song of Songs, the concept of romantic love between a man and a woman is shown to be a gift of God. The language and interaction of the Shulamite and her Beloved is very passionate. It's enough to make you blush, even snicker a bit embarrassed at times. But it was written that way purposefully.

When we're infatuated with one another, we're all giddy and pent up inside. Our chests get tight, our heads swim, we do plainly idiotic things, and stare into space with stupid looking grins, oblivious to the world. How wonderful is that!? Those emotions haven't been blessed unto mankind that we may fall by them. No! God gave us the sensation of elation in attraction that we might be drawn to each other to fulfill His will. Without the mechanism of sexual attraction, there would be no need to physically join with the opposite sex apart from the biological necessity of procreation. Procreation was never intended to be dull, boring or lifeless. It was intended to be invigorating, exciting, and altogether a lot of fun. But it was intended that way within the confines of marriage.

I've gotten off on a tangent here--as I'm ever so prone to doing--but I think it's important for Christians to realize that the emotions we have in relationships are a gift and not a curse. We should be so thankful that we've been blessed with the gift of emotions. Do they sometimes sting? Yes. Do we sometimes stumble as a result of them? Yes. But that doesn't make the emotions unrighteous, it makes us weak. I think that we can all agree quite strongly that we're all weak.

That brings us to the crux of my post. Do not fear lusting "by accident." Lust is very much an intentional, selfishly motivated sin. You'll know when you do it. If you spontaneously picture your beloved without their clothes on and then exorcise the image just as soon as it came, don't worry about it. Satan does all kinds of devious little things like this to tempt us to fall. He's hoping that you'll dwell on that image, and lust as a result. Remember, our nature is still sinful. Our heart still desires sinful things, but our spirits are committed to Christ. As long as you are fully set on doing God's will, your sinful desires will not eclipse your desire for righteousness. Sinning is very much a willful, intentional thing. You know when you do it. It's not a natural byproduct of God-given emotions. It's a byproduct of our weakness.

So, embrace your girlfriend or boyfriend. Run your finger through his or her hair. Whisper flatteries in the ear of your lover. Hold them, kiss them, and love them. But always keep the will of God in the forefront of your mind. The process of wooing a mate for marriage is often a long one (to us it seems, anyway). The little things you do add up. The summation of the small things lead to the eventual joining in flesh under God. And that's the pinnacle of God's plan for the sexes.
 
Upvote 0

Rae_Psyche

Active Member
Jul 23, 2004
61
3
40
San Juan, Puerto Rico
✟15,196.00
Faith
Christian
It seems to me that nowadays people have forgotten that yes God DID give us those emotions and feelings. He wanted us to enjoy ourselves with our partners. Thats why Song of Songs was written, and I agree with Jon_ on what he wrote about it. But we have to remember that the characters are already married, the Bible at least in spanish mentions that the wife is looking for her husband and so on. The point to all of this is that we shouldnt be playing around with fire, because we can get burnt. Exactly what the Enemy wants. I like to look at it this way, when I get married I am going to be enjoying my marriage because I have waited in God's perfect will and been obedient. I love my boyfriend and when you love you should also respect, and because of this respect I dont want him to fall into any kind of sin because of me, and vice-versa.

Just my thoughts on the topic
 
Upvote 0

Multi-Elis

Senior Veteran
Jul 6, 2003
2,173
114
42
Paris
Visit site
✟25,411.00
Faith
Christian
I'd like to raise this issue: what if touching caressing and kissing, were to arrouse you, and get you emotional to the point where you lost your rational thinking, I mean what if you do it to the wrong person, to a person you will regret doing this to if you break up?
And what if you know that kissing and touching will arouse you, so doing so would be a delibrate choise... like masterbuting, or delibrately looking at something else that arouses you?
Are there other ways to show respect, affection and give the other a feeling of significance, without running the risk of it turning into lust?
Is delibrately looking for arousal wrong?

As for song of solomon, it seems as if the story is talking more of a beautiful girl who likes her friend from the country side, and at the same time the king is in love with her, and takes her to his palace, and she then realises that she is actually in love with her friend from the country side, she tries to explain this to the king, as reasons for her not marrying the king, and so she runs away, and at the end she and her beloved are together, and they say: Solomon has many vineyards, with many people to whom he leases it (many wives, and many women to pick from) but we have our own little vineyard, just for ourselves to work in. The point is: you can't force somebody to marry somebody when you are in love with somebody else, so either just don't awaken love untill you have found the right person, or else don't force marry people.
 
Upvote 0

Rae_Psyche

Active Member
Jul 23, 2004
61
3
40
San Juan, Puerto Rico
✟15,196.00
Faith
Christian
Multi-Elis said:
I'd like to raise this issue: what if touching caressing and kissing, were to arrouse you, and get you emotional to the point where you lost your rational thinking, I mean what if you do it to the wrong person, to a person you will regret doing this to if you break up?
And what if you know that kissing and touching will arouse you, so doing so would be a delibrate choise... like masterbuting, or delibrately looking at something else that arouses you?
Are there other ways to show respect, affection and give the other a feeling of significance, without running the risk of it turning into lust?
Is delibrately looking for arousal wrong?

As for song of solomon, it seems as if the story is talking more of a beautiful girl who likes her friend from the country side, and at the same time the king is in love with her, and takes her to his palace, and she then realises that she is actually in love with her friend from the country side, she tries to explain this to the king, as reasons for her not marrying the king, and so she runs away, and at the end she and her beloved are together, and they say: Solomon has many vineyards, with many people to whom he leases it (many wives, and many women to pick from) but we have our own little vineyard, just for ourselves to work in. The point is: you can't force somebody to marry somebody when you are in love with somebody else, so either just don't awaken love untill you have found the right person, or else don't force marry people.
Exactly, the time when we should feel aroused is when we are married. Physical relationships just dont cut it with God, and touching, caressing, etc... (even though the person doesnt mean it) are part of a physical relationship.
 
Upvote 0

horuhe00

Contributor
Apr 28, 2004
5,132
194
43
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Visit site
✟29,431.00
Country
Puerto Rico
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Rae_Psyche said:
Exactly, the time when we should feel aroused is when we are married. Physical relationships just dont cut it with God, and touching, caressing, etc... (even though the person doesnt mean it) are part of a physical relationship.

So what is a couple that's in love to do? Handshake? :confused: There's got to be more liberties in a relationship because if not, it's just like having another friend.
SOMEWHERE in the Bible it's got to say what you can do, besides saying what you can't do.
 
Upvote 0

Multi-Elis

Senior Veteran
Jul 6, 2003
2,173
114
42
Paris
Visit site
✟25,411.00
Faith
Christian
Well the fact is that there exist couples who save their first kiss for the alter. I guess they find other ways to show affection while waiting for the Big Day.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think that a goodbye kiss or a kiss when getting engaged is bad or necessarily lustfull, and it won't necessarily arouse you much, but that is exactly the point of this thread, where is the limit, between a normal goodbye kiss, and holding hands once and a while, and a relationship that becomes based on the physical aspect. These are two extremes, but in the place where they converge, where is the limit?
 
Upvote 0

Jon_

Senior Veteran
Jan 30, 2005
2,998
91
43
California
✟26,116.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Multi-Elis said:
I'd like to raise this issue: what if touching caressing and kissing, were to arrouse you, and get you emotional to the point where you lost your rational thinking, I mean what if you do it to the wrong person, to a person you will regret doing this to if you break up?

I'm having a little bit of a hard time discerning your exact argument.

If one is the kind of person that can be "overcome" with emotions--note that this is a cop-out, there is no travail which avails the power of Christ--then one should avoid situations that make one overly emotional. Of course, this would include physical closeness with ones significant other. If one does not struggle with emotions and is confidently walking in God's will, then I fail to see how this creates a problem.

On your second point, I'm a little more fuzzy. Are you saying that we should avoid being physical simply because we might end up breaking up? I'm not sure how I would regret hugging, holding, or kissing a girlfriend, simply because we broke up. I'd be extremely guilty and regretful if I had slept with her, though (perhaps thinking that we'd get married, for instance).

Multi-Elis said:
And what if you know that kissing and touching will arouse you, so doing so would be a delibrate choise... like masterbuting, or delibrately looking at something else that arouses you?

Then it becomes lust, and thus, sinful. If you cannot avoid lusting as a result of physical closeness (whether it arouses you or not), then you should avoid it completely. I might also further encourage you to explore with God why your emotions so strongly manipulate you. It's unhealthy for born-again Christians to be slaves to their emotions. 1 John 3:20 says,

"And beloved, if our heart deceives us, know that God is greater than our hearts and knows all things."

Multi-Elis said:
Are there other ways to show respect, affection and give the other a feeling of significance, without running the risk of it turning into lust?

Of course. Saying nice things, giving gifts, doing favors, etc. All these things relate respect, affection and give the other a feeling of significance. They rarely result in lustful feelings as well. But just remember that lust is a personal sin. It is a result of a person's weakness. In particular, succumbing to their sinful nature.

Stumbling with lust is indicative of a more peculiar problem with the person, rather than their environment. True, it is difficult to endure in situations where temptation is great. For instance, it would be hard to resist lust if a dozen gorgeous members of the opposite sex suddenly threw themselves at you. But either way you look at it, the sin is still a personal rebellion against God, no matter what the circumstances. I think we get away from this fact too much. We try to rationalize our sins by attributing it to a "sinful environment," or "too much temptation." Sin is sin. It doesn't matter if you are assaulted with the highest order of temptation you can stand by the devil himself. God commands that you resist in accordance with His will and failing to do so is inexcusible (not unforgivable, of course).

Multi-Elis said:
Is delibrately looking for arousal wrong?

That's a pretty grey area. I'd say yes, though. Deliberating looking for personal arousal to satisfy your own carnal needs would certainly qualify as lustful in my book; however, if you're trying to equate physical contact that has the potential to cause physical arousal with lust through this post hoc argument, then it falls short.

Multi-Elis said:
As for song of solomon, it seems as if the story is talking more of a beautiful girl who likes her friend from the country side, and at the same time the king is in love with her, and takes her to his palace, and she then realises that she is actually in love with her friend from the country side, she tries to explain this to the king, as reasons for her not marrying the king, and so she runs away, and at the end she and her beloved are together, and they say: Solomon has many vineyards, with many people to whom he leases it (many wives, and many women to pick from) but we have our own little vineyard, just for ourselves to work in.

The point is: you can't force somebody to marry somebody when you are in love with somebody else, so either just don't awaken love untill you have found the right person, or else don't force marry people.

Your point deprives the Song of Solomon of so much joy. To take it as a dry treatise on the concept of following your heart with regards to marriage is an ill-conceived argument at best, especially when you consider the time and cultural view on marriage of the time. Most marriages in Solomon's time were arranged. That means you were betrothed to your husband or wife typically well before you were even thinking about a spouse. And we can hardly help but "awaken" love until we've found the right person. Our emotions are pretty well out of our control. You can't help but feel the way you feel.

I think that intrepretation deprives the reader of the wonder of relating to the Shulamite and her Beloved. The experience of love and infatuation is profound. It is a God-given gift that has been instilled in us that He may be glorified by it. Just as Christ gave Himself completely for the church, so the husband should give himself completely for his bride. He should love her with Christ's love, an undying, unconditional, unfailing love. Our desire for Christ should be mirrored in our desire for our spouse. I can only speak for myself, but my love for my Savior is desperate and deep. I can't fathom loving anyone else with that level of intensity, but I am confident that God will bring me a woman deserving of it.

That's the promise of love that God has given us. Don't deny it! Delight in it! Praise God that he has not made us unfeeling droids, warding away all emotions and physical contact lest we fall. Instead, if we are truly confident in our commitment to Christ, we should open our hearts to the gift that God bestows upon us. Take joy in your significant other. God has given them to you that you might experience the joyous feelings that come there with. So long as you always put God first, you shall never fail the test.
 
Upvote 0

Multi-Elis

Senior Veteran
Jul 6, 2003
2,173
114
42
Paris
Visit site
✟25,411.00
Faith
Christian
I'm having a little bit of a hard time discerning your exact argument
I'm just using the socrates method to try to arrive at some understanding.
Of course. Saying nice things, giving gifts, doing favors, etc. All these things relate respect, affection and give the other a feeling of significance. They rarely result in lustful feelings as well. But just remember that lust is a personal sin. It is a result of a person's weakness. In particular, succumbing to their sinful nature.
While this may be true, I have a hard time seeing how it clicks in. Can you give examples of how the saying nice things and gift giving and doing favors can become lust? I'm basically trying to get you to be more specific here.

About the song of sonlomon, I don't see it as a moralistic story, (other than "don't force people to marry against their will"), it's more like a theme that comes up - "I'm sick with a sickness called love, and if you don't want to be in my place, wonderfully in love with one person but at the same time considered for force marriage to another, just don't fall in love. (It's up to you to choose)

It appears that Song of Solomon could have been a play or a musical, and that people by tradition knew to whom to attribute the different parts of speach. Re-read the book with the proposition I gave, it is not at all dry, it is very exciting. It becomes more interresting, it stops being a boring "I love you and you are beautiful-and so are you" song but becomes a more action centered: "Don't you get it? So what if you think I'm beautiful and yadyadya, I can't marry you mister, because I'm in love with somebody else, you know what love is? I'll tell you..."
 
Upvote 0