Hello everyone, I have decided to register to this website only to post this thread and maybe get some few honest opinions. First, my name is Mia and I'm an 18 years old Christian and i'm currently in my 1st year in college (majoring in Geology). For so long I have been defending the word of God against doubters, and I tried my utmost best to convince people that Christianity strives for peace and justice among all people, to protect and restore the integrity of our earth and commit to a path of lifelong learning, compassion and selfless love. But recently, I've been asking myself whether or not God is real. I'm losing all of my faith in Him, in fact I don't think I believe in Him anymore. I think I'm becoming an Atheist. If He is real, then why does he tolerate so many bad things to happen? It doesn't make any sense at all... Why isn't He answering my prayers, why isn't He making my life any easier, why does he allow natural disasters like earthquakes and tsunamis to take place and kill thousands of people...? Why isn't Evolution mentioned in the bible, why isn't the big bang mentioned in the bible... When my antagonists used to tell me that the only reason I believe is because I'm too gullible, they weren't wrong. I used to tell them that God has determined that the only way we are saved is by faith and not by some substantiated empirical scientific data. But that's simply not fair.. You cannot possibly disprove something that isn't real firsthand. I think my question is, how do you know God exist? Thank you very much for reading this.
Hi,
I have been slammed many times for what I am about to tell you, and no, none of them were succesful unless they were just plain dogmatic, even scientifically so, close minded, and mean.
I am now 67 years old. My first professional job was working at Fairchild Research and Developement Corporation in Los Altos California. That was in 1969. I would spend the next 13 or so years in advanced research, and then continue being a researcher for life, for some reason or another.
Your questions are valid. To shorten this let my tell of some summaries of research projects done scientificallly but not in the area of Semiconductors.
Science is really finding out what God has done, and is commanded for us to do. God commanded us to do Science (including God also, thus always capitalized by me. Similarly Philosophy, and Relgion are mixtures of all discciplines together. Such as Philosophy includes Science and Religion. And, Religion includes Science and Philosophy. ) Science was commanded by us in Genesis. It came under the Blessing to subdue the earth. A blessing by God is a command also, as the people departing from Noah's Ark found out, when some of them refused to spread. God did something. They then spread. It is actually said twice that they spread.
Notice I am talking to you like a student. I am also expecting you, like a student in school to do your homework. That requires you to look up all that I have said. Only then will you start to understand. And like in school, only when you have forgotten all that, and relearned it three times, you will not be an expert, till then.
So starting again:
Science, always captalized, is findding out what God has done.
Religion, captalized, is finding out what parts of all that is known about spirits, is actually provably true, and it includes, Science and Religion.
Philosophy, again captalized, is the study of all thought, with proofs to see which of it is true and which of it is false.
Science, lower case, does not mean God is not real. Geology and what you are finding out, is merely telling you that your knowledge of what you knew Biblically was indeed in error, Science wise, and since if God is Real, and Science is Real, and the Bible is Real, then the discrepancies you and others see are merely misunderstandings.
Now, let me tell you of my own work. I was an agnostic. I didn't know if God was real. I worried about it, as I was born a Catholic. I did not know though. I did not.
Somewhere about age 35 or so, I started a research project for home. (It is the only way I know how to think.) It was to find out if The Bible was Real or not. I finished that with The Bible being proven real, by the results of controlled experiments. I did those, after I could not personally prove that book wrong. (A requirement for Advanced Research). I did those as the next step. After all, not being able to prove something is not wrong, does not prove it is right, all it proves is then, I could not prove it wrong. (I did check with everyone else though. I found no one else has ever proven that book wrong either, in the year 2000 or so.)
When I collected all the data, from those five controlled experiments, I summarized the data, which in my line of work, never allows for speculation. The summary is merely a restatement of my findings only.
My summary was: "The Bible is Real. It is True where it says it is True, and it is False where it says it is false."
Now let me tickle your scientific curiosity a little. One day while working on a set of problems no one had been able to solve for the last two and a half years, defeating one after another, using Research Techniques, and God, but I did not know that God was there yet, as I still then did not finish my proof, for The Bible. I was merely engaged in that proof. (As you know by now. Scientific types never say anything is true until it is proven, and proven, and proven and ......proven, with proofs that are passed on and checked by others, and they also always got the same results, that I did, or the orignal theorist did, using those same proofs that the first scientist did, Else the work is considered to be false.) Well one day, I had finished, and in summarizing I realized that I had a missing data point in a progression. It is not possible to publish normally, until I stop everything, and set up more controlled experiments, gather the data, throw out any piece of erroroneous data, summarize and then put that into the work I was on. Then I would be finished.
That would take me another three months, but aha, science teaches a person about God, it really does somehow. I then knew something about God in connection with that piece of work. In my trade, it is called calibration. I somehow had calibrated God, in this area alone possibly, but knew precisely what God would do, and I put down what God would do, without further work.
Was that point right? Did that data point work? Was it found to be wrong and then I lose my job, for being wrong. (In those days for that place, I could say I don't know the answer and not be punished ever. I could never be wrong though in any statement of research, or else I would lose my job, like those cold-fusion boys.) The data point was right.
Later feeling bad about that, I thought and thought, of how I could tell everyone in my field then, that I used God, for that point. I have never found a way back then to do so, in research, as God then was the new Heresey, it was no longer incorrectly using the Bible by church people that called Science heresey in Gallileo's time, nor on evolution, it is now God that is the new heresy, not sceince anymore.
So, I never had a way to tell them, that what they are most certainly using today, and is in some technical book, or science book today possibly, was actually determined by calibrating God, and using that calibration for that answer.
Maybe that can help. Maybe there is no discrepancies between science and God, it is only in what we think, we know, rather than even what some of our Christian Theologians would like us to believe.
LOVE and love,
...Katerina., ...... .
P.S. Researchers are niether writers nor good spellers.
...Katerina., ...... .