I have to confess I havent seen the value for homiletics or Bible study in general. I use the one year Anglican lectionary, and the Collect and lessons appointed for morning and evening prayer and most importantly, those appointed for Holy Communion inform the content of my services (I am tempted, since Advent is almost upon us, to try the RCL starting with the new “Year D” an interesting pastor composed, which does address shortcomings, but then the thought of enduring three years before it rolls around again is a bit of a “buzzkill.”)
The main problem with Logos is it generally lacks the commentaries I want, which tend to be Patristic commentaries which discuss the subject of the verse but not the verse itself. Also, correct me if I’m wrong, but my impression was that Logos offered inferior support for the deuterocanonical books, some of which I regard as extremely important, such as Sirach, Wisdom and Tobit, and the longer version of Esther.
On those occasions when I cannot think of a good homily, I read (and am careful to credit) excerpts from great Patristic homilies by St. John Chrysostom, Gregory Nazianzus, and other masterful preachers of the early churc.
