One has to wonder why the US consistently votes against these sorts of resolutions. The same sort of thing happened with the Land Mine treaty. The worlds largest supplier of Land Mines was one of the few who voted against banning them.Profit Margins and Mortality Rates
By Joanne Mariner, FindLaw.com
November 26, 2003
Here are some numbers to consider: 14 million, 35.9 billion, and 1.
The first is an estimate of the number of people who will die of AIDS and other treatable diseases over the course of the coming year, most of them in the poor countries of the developing world.
The second figure represents the combined 2002 profits, in dollars, of the 10 biggest pharmaceutical companies listed in Fortune magazine's annual review of America's largest businesses.
The third figure corresponds to the number of countries that, last week, voted against a U.N. resolution on access to drugs in global epidemics such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. The resolution emphasized that the failure to deliver life-saving drugs to millions of people who are living with HIV/AIDS constitutes a global health emergency. One hundred sixty seven countries voted in favor of the resolution. The single vote against it was cast by the United States.
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17281
One has further to wonder about the Bush claims to want to promote the welfare of the worlds "poor and downtrodden" if it consistently votes against resolutions that actually will help them. Money first... people if it's politically convenient.