Solomons Porch
Solomon's Porch
- Jan 8, 2017
- 3,664
- 5,854
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Didn't the UN conclude that the rebels were the ones who did the last attack?
UN has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas
Syrian rebels used Sarin nerve gas, not Assad’s regime: U.N. official
UN accuses Syrian rebels of chemical weapons use
UN's Del Ponte says evidence Syria rebels 'used sarin' - BBC News
At 18:40 the plane hit my house. We didn't feel any gas or anything. I have twins aged 10 months, and my wife. I carried them outside the house. While taking the kids out, people told me there's another strike at my family's house. all your family are dead. People were collapsing while talking to me. I ran to my family's house. When I got to the house, I first found my brother, Yasser, dead. (Other brother) AbdulKareem, dead. Shaima, my niece, dead. Hammoudi my nephew, dead. Ammar, dead. I tried to help the neighbors but they were all dead. I fainted. I returned after four hours to ask where my kids were. I left them okay. I found them all dead. They suffocated to death by gas. Allah takes revenge. What's their fault, Ahmad and Aya? When I left Amad and Aya they were in good condition. What's their fault? My sweethearts, I left htem okay. I went to help others and thought my kids were okay. I went and returned to find everybody dead and my kids dead. They left and I haven't had enough of them. My sweethearts, Ahmad and Aya. May Allah accept you.
Watching Abdel Hamid Yousef, it does seem possible he is acting - it is similar to other staged videos of alleged but fake "Assad atrocities", but of course that could be a dreadful mistake to make too.
The truth is you cannot trust the media to give the truth on Syria.
Abdul Hamid Yousef lost about 25 members of his family in the sarin attack, including his wife and 10-month-old twins, 2 brothers, their children, and their cousins. Here are his twins, Aya and Ahmad, when they were alive:
Their father said on CNN before breaking down into tears:
"What international community is this that doesn't listen to people? Is there even a humanitarian conscience still? There aren't any left. And all the Arab leaders, they're all asleep! And the US does whatever suits its interests. And the Russians have their own interests with Bashar, their tyrant. My children aren't the first to be martyred."
"My entire family's gone." This Syrian man says around 25 of his family members died in the chemical attack including his wife and two twin babies. 'My entire family's gone': Syrian man says 25 relatives died in strike - CNN.com
Another video on BBC: Syria chemical 'attack': Father mourns twins Aya and Ahmed
Transcription (the translation is in the video too, so just watch that):
There has been no determined source for the attack. The weapons were known to have been part of the Syrian army's stockpile, but rebels could have looted it. There were suspicious munitions among the rebels at the time, but the regime had better means to deliver the attack in the manner it happened, as well as facilities to produce the weapons used. So it is very difficult to determine who did it. Both sides had motive, means, and the opportunity to strike using the weapons.Quite right, the rebels/terrorists have a track record of doing gas attacks and then (with Western mainstream media support) blame the Assad govt. They usually time such attacks when the Syrian army and its Russian/Iranian/Hezbollah allies are winning and just before a major peace talks conference in Europe. The Assad govt has absolutely no benefit in this timing. It is a pattern. But you only know the pattern if you read beyond US mainstream media (which censored the report by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh that exposed al-Nusra rebels/terrorists as behind the 2013 Ghouta sarin gas attack in Syria that was blamed on the Assad govt.)
Here's the thing for me: I can't see what motive Assad would have for doing this. By all accounts he's slowly winning the war. He has Russian support, he's finally got the US to back off and say they're not gonna interfere, and so on. So why on Earth would he go and do the one thing that not only seems entirely unnecessary in the context of the greater war effort, but that would also get the United States to actually step in and act against him? They're not stupid; they must have known that this sort of thing would have got the West to rally against him.There has been no determined source for the attack. The weapons were known to have been part of the Syrian army's stockpile, but rebels could have looted it. There were suspicious munitions among the rebels at the time, but the regime had better means to deliver the attack in the manner it happened, as well as facilities to produce the weapons used. So it is very difficult to determine who did it. Both sides had motive, means, and the opportunity to strike using the weapons.
Here's the thing for me: I can't see what motive Assad would have for doing this. By all accounts he's slowly winning the war. He has Russian support, he's finally got the US to back off and say they're not gonna interfere, and so on. So why on Earth would he go and do the one thing that not only seems entirely unnecessary in the context of the greater war effort, but that would also get the United States to actually step in and act against him? They're not stupid; they must have known that this sort of thing would have got the West to rally against him.
Has someone really shown a good reason for Assad to have done this? I haven't seen it, and I simply can't fathom why the Syrian government would have ordered this attack.
There has been no determined source for the attack. The weapons were known to have been part of the Syrian army's stockpile, but rebels could have looted it. There were suspicious munitions among the rebels at the time, but the regime had better means to deliver the attack in the manner it happened, as well as facilities to produce the weapons used. So it is very difficult to determine who did it. Both sides had motive, means, and the opportunity to strike using the weapons.
Here's the thing for me: I can't see what motive Assad would have for doing this. By all accounts he's slowly winning the war. He has Russian support, he's finally got the US to back off and say they're not gonna interfere, and so on. So why on Earth would he go and do the one thing that not only seems entirely unnecessary in the context of the greater war effort, but that would also get the United States to actually step in and act against him? They're not stupid; they must have known that this sort of thing would have got the West to rally against him.
Has someone really shown a good reason for Assad to have done this? I haven't seen it, and I simply can't fathom why the Syrian government would have ordered this attack.
Martyrs go to parasise. It's going to be okay.