LGBT activists don't want anthropologists to ID remains as male or female

[RDKirk]

Nevermind.

You don't believe that happened?

 

[Ana the Ist]

It's an idiotic comment. Period. Maybe it gives some people a feeling of righteous indignation to get all puffed up about it. Go figure...

Right....I agree it's idiotic. I remember a lot of posters here expressing similar sentiments about defund the police. 2-4 weeks later, they were defending some version of the idea.

Can you say for certain that regardless of how popular this idea hypothetically becomes....you'll reject it?

 

[rjs330]

You don't believe that happened?

I was going to post something and decided not to.

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

LGBT Activists Push to Bar Anthropologists from Identifying Human Remains as 'Male' or 'Female'

Interviewer gaining information about a client:
"Name?" "Joe Bloggs."
"Age?" "Thirty nine."
"Sex?" "Yes."

 

[RDKirk]

LGBT Activists Push to Bar Anthropologists from Identifying Human Remains as 'Male' or 'Female'

Here is where trans activists are caught in a lie, and I believe Ana the Ist has pointed this out.

The want to argue first that gender is a social construct separate from biological sex, and that while biological sex might be male or female, either could be man or woman.

Now, they want to deny that biological sex is a real thing, and that a person must not even be identified as male or female, even with no attempt to categorize them as man or woman.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Here is where trans activists are caught in a lie, and I believe Ana the Ist has pointed this out.

The want to argue first that gender is a social construct separate from biological sex, and that while biological sex might be male or female, either could be man or woman.

Now, they want to deny that biological sex is a real thing, and that a person must not even be identified as male or female, even with no attempt to categorize them as man or woman.

It's not really worth explaining to people on this forum....but these people don't believe in an objective reality.

I know that sounds weird....they think truth is entirely relative though.

It's possible to make a very complicated philosophical argument in defense of this....but it's not really as strong as the one for an objective reality.

Now...gender studies experts probably can't make either argument, they simply choose the position that benefits them most and run with it, regardless of any consequences.

Frankly, I hope they advance this argument.

If they succeed, no more feminists complaining about the patriarchy. That would assume too much.

 

[Joy]

MOD HAT ON

After Staff Review

This Thread
is Now
Permanently Closed

RV: Flaming and Goading

MOD HAT OFF​