Lets vote for the Bible to be our form of government- #vote for God

Status
Not open for further replies.

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
would you model your camps on Auschwitz? or would you prefer a more efficient and user friendly death camp design?
again just because someone fails at an olympic race, or takes a bronze, even....does that mean they avoid the sport all together the next year? They fail to participate because competitors beat them?
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
He's being sarcastic, dude. There's no such thing as a Biblically prescribed government. There are certainly godly principles by which governments should rule, but no specified form of government. And none of it will end sin.
Well God's rule is what we are commanded to pray for every day if you don't remember the Lords prayer "our father who art in heaven....they kingdom come, thy will be done." If His will is what should be done, why not make His will law? After all when His kingdom comes you don't think He will make it law? Well then I would study a little more of the millenial reign as depicted in the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
God's Word is perfect, human beings and their interpretation of scripture are not. That is the reason why there are so many denominations. Because if you throw 10 professing bible believing Christians into a room that have never met each other before after having read the bible cover to cover independently, they will probably all have 10 different doctrines.
It's a limitation on us.
I'll follow Christ when He implements the law, and I'm glorified to where I'm able to obey it to the letter without temptation or fail, and I will try my best to obey the law as I read it and understand it, though I will make mistakes.
But do I want some man to try and implement his interpretation of the law on me and kill me when I make mistakes? No.
The Holy Spirit guarantees that if we follow Him, He will interpret scripture. 99% of Bible heresies are answered if you read 90 verses before, and 90 verses after the text to gain context.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
And now the question becomes: Which version of Christianity would be the dominant influence behind this Christian Theocracy? Catholic? Anglicanism? Eastern Orthodox? Protestant? And if the answer is Protestant, then which Protestant denomination would be accepted as the guideline? Church of Christ? Southern Baptist? Baptist? Methodist? Nazarene? Presbyterian? Lutheran? Pentecostal? Assemblies of God? Mennonite? I could go on and list quite a few more Christian denominations, but it would take me several hours to find the names of every church in the United States and include them in this post.

Based on my 30+ years of experience with the Christian faith, I'm not naïve enough to think that the Christians from all these various Christian denominations will unanimously agree on which version of Protestantism to endorse as the right version of Christianity to be enforced by the government. What about Catholics and every other Christian sect that isn't Protestant? What about them and their rights?
I have said before I wouldn't endorse sectarianism, or denominationalism. That is not the point. I don't wish to make a certain pastor rich. I would select first and foremost 12 apologests, ravi zacharius, ron rhodes, ken ham, kent hovind, norman geisler, june hunt, john ankerburg, the berean call ministry, hank hanagraaf, but I haven't prayed for a list of exact people, these are just people off hand that I like, that offer a unique perspective into apologetics. And they would each have a single vote as to what was considered "a christian viewpoint legally speaking." This would also be sent to another department, of seminary leaders of top seminaries and they would vote on orthodox doctrine. So one department would limit what was within "the pale of orthodoxy." As in what was christian, and then the next group would vote on what was considered "christian legally speaking." And then once a list of organizations were compiled, then federal funding would be given to those churches to distribute wellfare, and to take care of many social services. Such as pregnancy centers, soup kitchens, food stamp regulation, etc all that would be through the 'orthodox churches."
 
Upvote 0

paul1149

that your faith might rest in the power of God
Site Supporter
Mar 22, 2011
8,460
5,268
NY
✟674,964.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
yes the law is fulfilled, yet Christ said to "establish it." So what did He mean?
Christ did not say to establish the law, but Paul said we do:

Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law. -Rom 3:31​

What does he mean? The context there is that "all have sinned and fallen short..." He is not trying to set up a legal system again.Why would he? The perfect one already failed miserably. Remember, this is the same Paul who says:

Romans 7:6 But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.

Galatians 2:19 "For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God.

Galatians 4:3 So also we, while we were children, were held in bondage under the elemental things of the world.

"For if I rebuild what I have once destroyed, I prove myself to be a transgressor. -Gal 2:18

Galatians 5:14 For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, "YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."​

So he's not trying to say we need to live by law again. He's saying that our sin, and our inability to rise above our sin, is itself proof of the law's divine origin. Our inability to keep the law testifies to its perfection, while at the same time it points to our need of grace for salvation.

Give Galatians, Rom 1-8, and 2Cor 3 some careful study.
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟155,600.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
After all when His kingdom comes you don't think He will make it law?

God will indeed establish his kingdom. God. God will do this, not you.

Or do you think you've been given a special calling to establish God's kingdom for him in the here and now - before he comes?
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
4,790
3,132
New England
✟194,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It’s easy to want a theocracy when you think your faith will be the one that is represented. It becomes less exciting when you find that to not be the case anymore. Several thousand years of human history shows that nothing unites people of all backgrounds faster and more efficiently than a united desire to bring down a common enemy.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
The Holy Spirit guarantees that if we follow Him, He will interpret scripture. 99% of Bible heresies are answered if you read 90 verses before, and 90 verses after the text to gain context.

That boils down to a "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
You admit that "sure, the Catholic Church controlling Europe instituting a theocracy under them was bad, but that wasn't the RIGHT theocracy, we'll do it the RIGHT way this time! It's almost like socialists saying "Sure, the USSR, China, and Venezuela did/are doing socialism the WRONG way, but if it was done the RIGHT way it'd be Utopia!". Those Bernie Sanders voters etc
I'm terrified of anyone but Jesus implementing biblical law as a form of worldly government because man is fallible and will screw it up and it will cause persecution and suffering among believers. In fact I think about the prophetic books and the antichrist and how for 3 and a half years they will go back to the sacrifices and rebuild the Temple. They may try to enforce Rabbinical theocracy in Israel up until the sacrifices stop at the abomination of desolation.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,554
13,713
✟429,169.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Then I demand a return to God's government, an Eastern Orthodox emperor! And the only Bible permitted is in Greek.

Oooo...them's fightin' words there! :mad:

*Calls you out in Coptic, with about 70% Greek vocabulary*
 
Upvote 0

lsume

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 14, 2017
1,491
696
70
Florida
✟417,518.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am of the opinion that all problems in society came from the fall yes, but secondly they came from involving the first hebrew nation in the old testament to have a kingship. Some say that theocracies never work, yet we have never had a government simply legislate the Bible alone. The Jews never followed the strict tanach. They would go thousands of years not even reading the torah, and then King Josiah finds the scrolls one day all bundled up in the temple. So no we have never had a theocracy, accept before King saul. But no theocracy in the last four thousand years for sure. NOT A STRICT THEOCRACY.

The first amendment protects freedom of religion in some ways. And for that I am grateful, however I believe it also make it illegal to legislate religion as well.

What does the new testament teach about Government?
My theory is to follow this scripture:
"All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17

if political work is a good work, then the Bible it says "equips for every good work."

then that including politics, and that means that it is good to be used for political purposes.
Can you follow the logic? Now there are many misconceptions of what it would mean to legislate scripture as law legally speaking and I wish to take previous comments from other threads (now closed to start of this conversation if that is ok).

The first comment was from @Greengardener and she said this:


There are some questions as to what laws should be made into civil law. For example the law "you shall worship no other God." Does that mean it's illegal to be atheist or muslim? Well I would if I were to be in the place of trump running for 2020 as a person who would legislate the Bible. Upon getting elected I would have the top seminaries send the best of the best leaders and christian thinkers (which I would vet and interview with a panel) and declare what orthodox christianity is, and what doctrines incorporate that. The Trinity, soteriology, and covenants or dispensations, and any other doctrine.

On first hand I would outlaw non essential businesses from operating on the Sabbath. Gas stations, emergency rooms, police, hospitals, firefighters, etc are considered emergency services, they could all work but most commerce 99% of it would cease. But I am not sure about the gas station thing yet, I don't know if they are emergency. One could always have a spare can of gas. As far as American Holidays, there needs to be some explanation as to what is pagan and what is not. I believe Constantine blended roman holidays, pagan holidays with a christian twist when he converted to christianity. So they had pagan holidays, He gets saved, and now these same pagan holidays, now have a christian name. So we would do something a little different. We would take the christian part of the holiday, and remove the pagan aspects of them. This to me is only something that makes sense in a theocracy. Doing so now is merely personal basis. So for example on Christmas we would celebrate christs birth, but we would not have a tree, which was the pagan addition, but we would have something equally as fun, we would not take something away that we didn't substitute for something better. On easter we would have the resurrection celebrated but we would substitute out the easter bunny and the eggs which was the pagan addition. But we would still celebrate easter sunday, good friday....everyone would have good friday off as a paid holiday universally.

Again just because someone who had religious principles in government failed to follow the religion, does not mean that will be the case this time. That is called the fallacy of poisoning the well. Just because something is hard does not mean we don't do everything in our power to do what is right. I have a hard time believing that.


again Christ showed how religiousness without relationship was worthless, and condemned moralism and religiosity, without faith in Christ as the motivator. Christ sets us free from the law of sin and death, never the less. The law is not bad it is a school teacher to bring us to faith in Christ. While we will be legally required to follow the ten commandments you can follow them and still not be saved. It's not by our works we are saved. So this would just be civil law.


yes under normal circumstances I would agree that this task would be an impossibility. But our God is a God of the impossible and the Bible actually asks us to do impossible things in the name of Christ..."be perfect as I am perfect" for example. But to say it will happen like this this time, is impossible to know if we don't try.

Yes I would fast and pray for each member and ask for prayer and have prayer meetings to cover all of our own board meetings. If God is a God of prayer, He would meet us in our prayer and bless our nation. But ultimately if I was running for president I would have a choice over who was in the cabinet. Who was over everything. And I ultimately would pray to God to see what He wants me to do, not what I would want to do.



Power I am afraid is the one thing that would destroy the christian rule. Due to pride. But the fact that christianity is so peculiar to our culture: (homosexuality is wrong, a woman should submit, no women pastors, one woman one man marriage) that these things are meant to be rejected by the masses and people would in fact hate God's rule. So I don't think this will happen, but it's only because we don't truly believe in God's word, nor in the power of God to do something like this. But the Bible explicitly says if we had the faith of a mustard seed, He could move a mountain into the ocean.

I have been talking about this in other threads. All freedoms that one man gains, is at the cost of another mans freedom. The right to bear arms is at the cost of another mans freedom not to want people around him to be armed. The freedom to have homosexuals marry is at the cost of the freedom of a christian pastors rights NOT to marry them, or bake a cake for them, or take pictures of their event, etc. So you see, freedom is not free. Most if not all freedoms cost something. Freedom comes from God but it's not free. It is very costly. So again in Jesus condemning homosexuality He literally took their freedom away to become christian and obtain eternal life. He did so with the adulterer, and the thief and the lyer as well in dozens of verses. So yes Christianity does take away freedoms, it's probably one of the most limiting religion in the world as far as "worldly freedoms." But one of the most joyful for sure, due to serving others in Christ's love.


The early colonizers had in some limited aspects the same view I do, "let God rule the nation." It's not my own theory it's been practiced in some forms in some limited circles every since america was founded. In fact in a supreme court ruling a supreme court justice ruled "america is a christian nation." This ruling was overturned by the bill of rights and the constitution itself. But we should still strive for God to rule, again if scripture is "given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and if political work is good work, then the Bible it says that itself alone "equips for every good work." so that including politics, and that means it can and should be legislated. Now that does not mean we should not each have our own walk with God and our own prayer life. But my cabinet by law will be required to read scripture, memorize scripture, to pray over decisions in various ways that will be part of their job. And if I don't think their walk with the Lord is right, or if they are getting too proud, I can fire them for no reason at all. Like any president can.
The best government that ever existed was when God ruled through His prophets. In The Lord’s Prayer, we pray for God’s Kingdom to come. We are praying for a much better rule. God will teach everyone directly. Unfortunately the direction of the world is down. The severe drop in morality around the world will come at a price. The environment isn’t something we need to worry about.

Gen.8

  1. [22] While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
God’s promise to the world after the flood stands.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Quartermaine

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2019
2,794
1,615
49
Alma
✟80,772.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
again just because someone fails at an olympic race, or takes a bronze, even....does that mean they avoid the sport all together the next year? They fail to participate because competitors beat them?
Participate?

I'm not going to sit quietly while the tyrannical government you are proposing lays waste to this country. I understand that the proper response to tyranny is to oppose it with every resource at your command. And I won't stop. So what will you do with me and the millions of people just like me?
 
Upvote 0

GACfan

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2019
1,958
2,257
Texas
✟77,930.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Participate?

I'm not going to sit quietly while the tyrannical government you are proposing lays waste to this country. I understand that the proper response to tyranny is to oppose it with every resource at your command. And I won't stop. So what will you do with me and the millions of people just like me?

My sentiments exactly. I was going to post something similar to convey that I would oppose, rebel against, and aggressively fight any form of Christian theocracy until my dying breath, but you have accurately expressed what I wanted to say. I would never submit to a Christian dictatorship.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: panman
Upvote 0

angelkiss

Veteran
Dec 15, 2005
34,036
270
✟41,855.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
While it is good to have believers in the political system, I don't agree with taking God's Word and turning it into man-made law. That just appears as mankind trying to play God and that's not what it's about or what it's for.
The flesh is too flawed which sometimes gets in the way of views and the way they're perceived. I can guarantee that there will be someone who will differ on a point of view. (more than one actually) So then starts the arguing on who's right and who's wrong.
Everyone on this earth has free will that was bought and paid for by the blood of Christ. It's already there for the taking, all we have to do is make the choice of whether or not we want to accept it.
It don't have to be force-fed and no one has to be beat over the head with it. Living our lives in a way that glorifies God is what gets people curious about who God is and what He's about, not shoving everything down their throats. To do so will only push people further into rebellion.
As a Christian, I answer to God and do His will, on His time, not the will of men and their perception on how they think I should be, do, live and when.

Would I like to see the Ten Commandments put back? Yes
Would I like to see prayer being a choice again in the schools? Yes
Would I like to see other morals placed back that were once taken? Yes

But, to have mankind as fleshly and flawed as it is, take God's Word and try and control a whole population with it and basically turn it into a mockery? Absolutely not!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jamdoc
Upvote 0

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
again just because someone fails at an olympic race, or takes a bronze, even....does that mean they avoid the sport all together the next year? They fail to participate because competitors beat them?

Better metafor would probably be that there is a reason gladiator fights to the death are no longer practiced in these more civilized times.
 
Upvote 0

GreekOrthodox

Psalti Chrysostom
Oct 25, 2010
4,121
4,191
Yorktown VA
✟176,342.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Oooo...them's fightin' words there! :mad:

*Calls you out in Coptic, with about 70% Greek vocabulary*

We're not worried cause we get out of church faster than y'all cause we don't take 8 minutes to chant the Gospel reading. :p
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Christ did not say to establish the law, but Paul said we do:

Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law. -Rom 3:31​

What does he mean? The context there is that "all have sinned and fallen short..." He is not trying to set up a legal system again.Why would he? The perfect one already failed miserably. Remember, this is the same Paul who says:

Romans 7:6 But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.

Galatians 2:19 "For through the Law I died to the Law, so that I might live to God.

Galatians 4:3 So also we, while we were children, were held in bondage under the elemental things of the world.

"For if I rebuild what I have once destroyed, I prove myself to be a transgressor. -Gal 2:18

Galatians 5:14 For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, "YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF."​

So he's not trying to say we need to live by law again. He's saying that our sin, and our inability to rise above our sin, is itself proof of the law's divine origin. Our inability to keep the law testifies to its perfection, while at the same time it points to our need of grace for salvation.

Give Galatians, Rom 1-8, and 2Cor 3 some careful study.
again the law does not save us, but we must be careful to come to the same conclusion as those in the text that we should do away with the law. "God forbid." The law is a school master, and just like any school master you don't shoot them after getting the diploma, you allow them to teach others. so this is what it means, the law will never go away. So we just need to realize that, for without the law there is no sin. So again if it's sin, that goes to say, lets legalize that law and lets get at least some of those commands codified. Maybe not all of them I agree, many of them would be way to hard to regulate on a federal manner, lust being one, pride being another. But since we are not to do away with the law, but "establish it." And we know that the Bible incorporates the law of God, and we know that in 2 timothy 3:17 that the Bible equips men unto "all good works." and public policy makers (politicians) do have a good work ahead of them, so thus, We must conclude then that scripture is profitable too for public policy.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
God will indeed establish his kingdom. God. God will do this, not you.

Or do you think you've been given a special calling to establish God's kingdom for him in the here and now - before he comes?
we are commanded to "watch and wait." But in defining what watching and waiting for the master to return, what christ defines that is, is good works. And ministering and obeying the commands, and doing the work of the ministy. It's not saying, twiddle your thumbs, wait like you do in a line at costco. No we are watching, we are anticipating his return. Some say to prepare his Kingdom for Him to come and sit on the throne, and I can sort of agree with that. We can be like john the baptist as a forerunner to his first comming, be a forerunner of His 2nd comming.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It’s easy to want a theocracy when you think your faith will be the one that is represented. It becomes less exciting when you find that to not be the case anymore. Several thousand years of human history shows that nothing unites people of all backgrounds faster and more efficiently than a united desire to bring down a common enemy.
Sure. But fundamentalism is what will be represented, not one denomination or another. That is the misconception people often see, that one sect will run the government. No, the government will literally codify the Bible as law, the Bible will define what is Christian. And the Bible will be interpreted by those from the top seminaries of the country. I will vet them, because again I am the one running for president. And I will have two groups one group of apologists to sort doctrinal submissions, for instance mormonism, or jehovah's witness will be classified as not othodox by the group, but many think they are christian and that is fine. I just don't look at them as orthodox christian. And that is what the government will work off of. But no, one denomination will not be in charge.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That boils down to a "no true Scotsman" fallacy.
You admit that "sure, the Catholic Church controlling Europe instituting a theocracy under them was bad, but that wasn't the RIGHT theocracy, we'll do it the RIGHT way this time! It's almost like socialists saying "Sure, the USSR, China, and Venezuela did/are doing socialism the WRONG way, but if it was done the RIGHT way it'd be Utopia!". Those Bernie Sanders voters etc
I'm terrified of anyone but Jesus implementing biblical law as a form of worldly government because man is fallible and will screw it up and it will cause persecution and suffering among believers. In fact I think about the prophetic books and the antichrist and how for 3 and a half years they will go back to the sacrifices and rebuild the Temple. They may try to enforce Rabbinical theocracy in Israel up until the sacrifices stop at the abomination of desolation.
no sir, no theocracies have existed since after the king saul became the first king. Before that one can make some sense of God ruling, but again there was no direct law, other than the ten commandments, and maybe a few books of the bible at that time. So that was a primative theocracy before saul. But the catholic church was romanized in like the fourth century, I tend to agree with the views of the imperial catholic church over the romanized catholic church. But again no denomination or sect will be ruling the government, Just me. myself. hypothetically, or someone I trust to take the helm. But I will have again two groups of advisors, one group of 12 apologists, and another group of 12 seminary leaders, or christian leaders.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Participate?

I'm not going to sit quietly while the tyrannical government you are proposing lays waste to this country. I understand that the proper response to tyranny is to oppose it with every resource at your command. And I won't stop. So what will you do with me and the millions of people just like me?
well I suppose you would have to prove it tyrannical. I don't see God's word tyrannical, you have to obey it's principles to be saved, and that is ok to you, but you think to obey it's principles to be a law abiding citizen is tyrannical though? I think you should think this through.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.