Oh I know, it doesn't do anything to lesson the reality. I just thought the article was interesting.
Ok, fair enough.
Lysimachus said:
I do find some elements, however, in favor of annihilationism.
Always happy to look at elements.
Lysimachus said:
According to the myth, there was a "perpetual burning garbage dump" that was always burning.
I tend to favor the understanding that it was known as a cursed place...
...Where children were sacrificed to "Molech".
...As it was understood to be a cursed place I'm sure people dumped garbage there.
Lysimachus said:
However, it appears that the Valley of Hinom was a pagan place of sacrifices, where they sacrificed their sons and daughters by burning them with fire.
One thing is for sure. Fire is not burning where worms are. If the fire was still going, the worms would burn with the fire. It is not until after the fire has finished burning up the bodies that the worms feast of that which remains.
I certainly do believe in a literal fire, and it will be hot. I believe the wicked will suffer intensely. But the Bible texts used to support eternal torment of disembodied souls/spirits is elusive at best.
I have always found it interesting how in every single instance where Revelation mentions fire burning forever and ever, that it is always in context of the harlot, beast, or false prophet burning. It thus seems appropriate that symbolic language for the duration of suffering is employed for those symbolic figures receiving the punishment.
We agree that hell is literal however I noticed you said in speaking of that fire...
...That it "WILL be hot", as in future tense.
...This is the whole crux of the discussion isn't it.
This from the Jewish Encyclopedia.
JE said:
It is assumed in general that sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell (B. M. 83b). To every individual is apportioned two shares, one in hell and one in paradise. At death, however, the righteous man's portion in hell is exchanged, so that he has two in heaven, while the reverse is true in the case of sinners (Ḥag. 15a). Hence it would have been better for the latter not to have lived at all (Yeb. 63b). They are cast into Gehenna to a depth commensurate with their sinfulness. They say: "Lord of the world, Thou hast done well; Paradise for the pious, Gehenna for the wicked" ('Er. 19a).
This was my point with Timothew - that the Sadducee concept of the spirits of dead people being unconscious or not existing...
...Equates to their never having lived.
...Or putting it like Jesus did, "
never been born". Matthew 26,24
If an individual rejects Christ in the Adventist / Sadducee theological construct and dies...
...In the intermediate state between the death of the body AND the Resurrection.
...That person in THAT time hack becomes as if "they were never born".
...& subsequent to the General Judgment that same person in the Adventist construct.
...Gets burned into nothing and totally ceases to exist and AGAIN becomes as if they had never been born.
I'm saying this
Sadduceeish rubric makes a mockery of Christ's teachings because...
...According to the rubric Judas would become as if he was never born, TWICE!
...Once at the death of the body up through to the General Judgment THAN AGAIN after he is cast into hell.
...Where the Adventist groups insist a loving God burns up the lost and they cease to exist.
...And become as if they never existed in the first place.
Even worse than that they boldly affirm that Christ
could have mutated from perfect God...
...Into a sinning Christ with the end result of "God" throwing Christ into hell after God wakes Christ up from soul sleep.
...Then Christ would be totally burned up and forever cease to exist and become "as if He never existed in the 1st place"!
...What a thought!
The unfortunate reality is that EVERY denomination which advocates "the dead know nothing", "Jesus was unconscious in the tomb", etc....
...Share this horrific maggoty teaching.
...Which violates the Creed ( which is based off Scripture ) with a vigor past that of a pedophile loosed in a Chuck-E-Cheese.
As for the "worm".
Mark 9:44
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.
Strong's "WORM" said:
1) a worm, spec. that kind which preys upon dead bodies
Strong's "Quenched" said:
1) to extinguish, quench
a) of fire or things on fire
1) to be quenched, to go out
The only way for a worm to remain is if it continues to have something to eat....
...Combine that with a fire that will never go out.
...And you end up with a body that always has something for worms to eat & a fire which is never quenched.
It does not matter if these things are taken in a literal sense or figurative...
...The end result is a "state" that is contrasted as much as anything could be.
...With "eternal life".
A spiritual existence in hell would be only be a fore-taste....
...It's ONLY after the Resurrection one enters into eternal life OR eternal death.