Paul said that Jesus sent him "Not to water baptize".
Does this mean he never baptized anyone, exactly as CHRIST never water baptized anyone?
You knew that?
So, why did Paul tell you that "Christ sent ME not to WATER Baptize"?
Its so that people who are religious dont get confused with people who are born again.
See, the religious believe in water.
The Born again, believe in Christ.
Only Jesus Saves.
Water need not apply.
Also If you have a New Testament, read "the Acts of the Apostles".
Every time someone is water baptized, until the last chapter that is 28. this happens after they BELIEVED, first.
See, God saves not based on immersion, but based on "Faith is counted as righteousness".
"As many as BELIEVE in Me, i give unto them Eternal life".
"All that BELIEVE IN JESUS, shall be saved".
Water need not apply.
Read Acts 8. Philip and the Eunuch.
The Eunuch sees some water and wants to get in it and be Baptized by immersion.
Phillip is happy to oblige, under one CONDITION< and its the same one that Paul teaches.
"If you have BELIEVED with all your heart, FIRST".....then you may be water baptized.
See that?
See that BELIEVING? God sees that and SAVED THE EUNUCH, same as He saves us the same way.
After we BELIEVE on Jesus, and are BORN AGAIN....then we go get in the water.
The water, follows our Salvation.
It does not cause it.
So Jesus gets baptized Himself, and tells Nicodemus a man must be born of water and Spirit, and in Matt 16 that anyone who believes and is baptized has life and He tells is disciples,
“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
And He says that if we love Him we’ll do as He commands, and the ancient churches since day one have understood and practiced accordingly as attested by early church fathers as well. Everyone got baptized whether that was part of Paul’s personal mission or not. So we just do it; we don’t call the shots.
And yes, of course, ad infinitum ad nauseam, we’re justified by faith. Baptism is an expression and profession of that faith -as stated in more ways than one in the post you responded to-and then for some reason nonetheless wrote as if you were proclaiming it for the first time. And even Paul adds something, the need for profession, when He says in Rom 10:9,
“… that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
And even then we must understand what faith
means; its more than just rote belief, it implies action, which is what James was getting at, action compelled by faith rather than action -or works-compelled by self-righteousness.
“The only thing that counts is faith working through love.” Gal 5:6
And so Paul can also rightly say in Rom 8:12-13,
“Therefore, brothers and sisters, we have an obligation—but it is not to the flesh, to live according to it. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live.”
Jesus tells us in Matt 6:14-15,
“For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive yours.”
Again, it’s
ok to have obligation-to
do the right thing, in order to be saved- and that implies more than faith, which is why, one might presume, the Holy Spirit was sure to keep Paul from ever saying that we’re saved by faith alone even though faith is the progenitor of it all, in response to grace. So there’s no reason to pit the theology of Paul against any other theology-they’re all saying the same thing.