Sure:
1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own
Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.
It amazes me how you fail to comprehend option (4) contradicts your "Prime Directive".
Here is another example involving ancient Egypt which I know is going to upset you as in that other
post you went into full blown denial mode where the history of ancient Egypt backed by archaeology shows a global flood never occurred.
In this example the Bible says nothing about the economic and social state of ancient Egypt after 600,000 Israelite men plus women and children giving a total of around 2 million exited Egypt.
This is the case for "Bible says ø".
A substantial loss of the slave labour force representing a large percentage of Egypt's total population would have resulted in Egypt's economic and social collapse.
Science through archaeology indicates when Egypt went through economic and social collapse it occurred during periods of climate change where the annual Nile flood did not occur for years resulting in a serious decline in agriculture, foreign invasions such as the Hyksos, and civil war where the central authority of the pharaohs was lost to the increasing power of the
nomarchs.
Economic and social collapse did not occur due to the mass exodus of slaves.
To make matters worse if the Biblical Exodus occurred the most common date given is during Egypt's early 19th dynasty when it was at its most powerful economically and militarily and had an empire which extended into the Middle East.
Since there was no economic and social collapse due to a mass exodus of slaves this is the case for "Science says x".
According to your heuristics you "go with x" but now you have contradicted your "Prime Directive" as the science implies the Exodus could never had occurred as described in the Bible.