KJ3, KJ21 and KJV 2000 Bibles?

[VCViking]

Greetings Saints.

What are your opinions on these translations?

I have the KJ3, (along with the MKJV and the LITV from Green.) I don't really care for it that much though.

Anyone have the KJ21 and the KJV 2000? What are the main differences between the three and what is the comparison to the AV?

Thanks.

 

[VCViking]

Also, anyone have any input on the KJVer (Easy Reader)?

 

[DeaconDean]

Sorry brother, all I carry is my 1917 First Scofield Reference KJV Bible.

It has served me well, and I see no need to change now.

God Bless

Till all are one.

 

[VCViking]

Sorry brother, all I carry is my 1917 First Scofield Reference KJV Bible.

It has served me well, and I see no need to change now.

God Bless

Till all are one.

Thank you brother. I am coming to that conclusion.

 

[Thy WORD is TRUTH]

Didn't Scofield hold to limited atonement?

 

[VCViking]

Didn't Scofield hold to limited atonement?

Not sure but does it matter?

 

[Thy WORD is TRUTH]

Not sure but does it matter?

To me it does because I like to know the doctrine of the person writing the notes. Never owned a Scofield KJV before, but was thinking about it.

 

[Mountain Man Sam]

I own a KJV 2000. I bought a hard cover copy this year and I am very happy with it. It uses only the TR manuscripts and only updates archaic words. We may understand them but today's modern man/woman does not. I think it's unfair to ask them to read and think in a way that is foreign to them so that they can have the Word of God. The Word should be challenging to the soul but simple to understand. I love the KJV but it has its challenges for the 21st century person.
The KJV 21 solves that dilemma for me. While it still retains the "high language" sound of the Bible that I'm used to, it's elimination of archaic words bridges a distance that I appreciate.
Get one or read it for free online.