You don't buy her story. You don't speak for people generally.
I am neutral. She seemed very convincing to me. Even Trump was impressed with her testimony. The only thing that matters is if they get the three votes they need to appoint Kavanaugh. As soon as they get the votes they need he will be appointed to the court.
All of this drama is going to have an impact on the midterms. My guess would be that the GOP will pick up seats and votes. Although right now it is difficult to say if we will have a red tide or a blue tide. I do not think something like this could turn into a litmus test.
We know that people are going to be judged as they judge others. So the Democrats need to be prepared to live by the standard that they are so quick and willing to set for themselves.
This is Kavanaugh 7th FBI background check. IF he is not qualified then we need to fix the FBI. So that they do not qualify people that should not qualified. It is to bad that Trump had to get rid of Comey. But he admitted that he did not know how to VET people, so what good is he if he could not do his job?
Clarance Thomas says it best: " This is a circus. It's a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American,
it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree."
If the American people did not let the Senate get away with their: "high-tech lynching" with Thomas then why should they allow it for Kavanaugh?
