This is why some take issue with the pro-life movement. You start out with assumptions based on nothing I have said or insinuated. Then you move on to self congratulatory claims of work that has, to date, fallen short of what is needed. You finish off by belittling and demonizing those you disagree with.
This is what it looks like to be part of the problem instead of helping.
There's plenty of issues to have with the pro-life movement. I've enumerated them on several occasions.
-significant overlap with the "abstinence-only education" movement
-against any and all forms of social welfare programs that would make single motherhood more approachable
-supporting movements to refuse contraception access on the grounds that "I shouldn't have to pay for that"
(all of which increase the demand for abortion)
The main issue is that nobody that I'm aware of (in US politics) is pushing for a "reasonable middle ground proposal"
Either "you're siding with the aforementioned pro-lifers", or you're siding with the people who's positions on abortion are further left than the Scandinavian countries.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not comfortable with being forced to choose between siding with people who think that abstinence-only education works and celebrating Hobby Lobby not having to cover birth control pills, or siding with people who think that elective abortions up through the 3rd trimester are a "celebration-worthy" symbol of women's' autonomy.
If there was a politician who proposed a model that resembled what the Scandinavian countries have, which is exceptions for rape/incest/health, and capping elective abortions at 14-16 weeks, they'd have my support along with 80% of the US population (according to public polling)