What do you really think about this?
If someone in my team, when I had teams, violated a basic rule like a using personal email for work, then there would be a disciplinary procedure. Comey’s conclusion is the same approach any organisation would take:
From one of the articles you linked to/
‘The FBI probe focused on whether Clinton or her staff violated federal laws governing the handling of classified information, and whether foreign powers or hostile actors hacked into her private server, which was located at her home in New York.
FBI Director James Comey on July 5 announced that although Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in handling classified information, the FBI did not find evidence that their actions were intentional. He declined to pursue criminal charges’
For some reason you simply dismiss this out of hand, while also claiming that the Mueller report, despite it’s conclusions that the Trump campaign was ‘receptive’ to Russian meddling in the election in Trump’s favour, and that there was sufficient evidence of obstruction of justice for a legal case to be made, but that Mueller saw pursuing this as outside of his remit, you continually (and falsely) claim the report entirely exonerates Trump.
If, on the other hand, someone in one of my teams had decided one day to take a load of confidential information to their home, in cardboard boxes, and then refused to give it back, that would go beyond a simple disciplinary matter. Personally I would question that person’s sanity.
You genuinely can’t see any difference here? You don’t see the double standard you are using?