***Judge Orders DOJ to Publish Redactions in the Mueller Report

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,403
15,493
✟1,109,304.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It isn't over until the fat lady sings.
The Count questions whether Barr was "influencing the public in favor of Trump".

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish information redacted from the Mueller report that had been designated as privileged.
...
..."After a very thorough review, the Court found that the Justice Department violated federal law...We look forward to the release of this additional information by November 2."
...
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" and the DOJ's arguments in the FOIA lawsuit, the judge added.

Judge orders DOJ to publish info redacted as privileged from Mueller report
 

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,352
10,607
Georgia
✟912,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It isn't over until the fat lady sings.
The Count questions whether Barr was "influencing the public in favor of Trump".

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to publish information redacted from the Mueller report that had been designated as privileged.
...
..."After a very thorough review, the Court found that the Justice Department violated federal law...We look forward to the release of this additional information by November 2."
...
"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" and the DOJ's arguments in the FOIA lawsuit, the judge added.

Judge orders DOJ to publish info redacted as privileged from Mueller report

"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia had ruled that the House Judiciary Committee was entitled to see usually secret grand jury material that was redacted by the Trump Justice Department from the Mueller report on the 2016 election when it was handed over to the committee.

At the request of the Justice Department, the high court temporarily blocked the lower court order from going into effect. And now the court to hear the case this fall, with a decision almost certain to come after the election."
Supreme Court Acts To Postpone More Controversies, From Mueller Report To Abortion
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,403
15,493
✟1,109,304.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia had ruled that the House Judiciary Committee was entitled to see usually secret grand jury material that was redacted by the Trump Justice Department from the Mueller report on the 2016 election when it was handed over to the committee.

At the request of the Justice Department, the high court temporarily blocked the lower court order from going into effect. And now the court to hear the case this fall, with a decision almost certain to come after the election."
Supreme Court Acts To Postpone More Controversies, From Mueller Report To Abortion
Ok Your article is from July. Are you sure the two articles are referring to the same redactions?

But it isn't like this report coming out on Nov 2, is going to change anyone's vote.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0