John Shelby Spong: A Question

wayseer

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2008
8,226
503
Maryborough, QLD, Australia
✟11,121.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I was wondering, how well-accepted is John Shelby Spong among Anglicans/Episcopalians/Old Catholics here in the forum and in the wider Anglican Communion?

I don't quite know what you mean by 'well-accepted' but in my neck of the woods his work is looked on more than favourably.
 
Upvote 0

Cajun Huguenot

Cajun's for Christ
Aug 18, 2004
3,055
293
64
Cajun Country
Visit site
✟4,779.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I would tend to be closer to the "abhor" category. I find it hard to look kindly on a "Christian minister" who denies so many essential/fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith. He denies the virgin birth, he also denies the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Without the virgin birth, with out a physical resurrection of Jesus, the Christian faith does not exist. Without those essential teachings, at best, Bishop Spong teaches little more than a modern form of Gnosticism.

IMO - Bishop Spong is a good example of what is most wrong in the Episcopal Church (USA).

Kenith
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I would tend to be closer to the "abhor" category. I find it hard to look kindly on a "Christian minister" who denies so many essential/fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith. He denies the virgin birth, he also denies the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Without the virgin birth, with out a physical resurrection of Jesus, the Christian faith does not exist. Without those essential teachings, at best, Bishop Spong teaches little more than a modern form of Gnosticism.

IMO - Bishop Spong is a good example of what is most wrong in the Episcopal Church (USA).

Kenith
I would have to disagree about the virgin birth (or, more properly, virginal conception) - I hold it to be true but it is not remotely central to Christian faith in the way resurrection is.
 
Upvote 0

ContraMundum

Messianic Jewish Christian
Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
15,666
2,957
Visit site
✟78,078.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I would have to disagree about the virgin birth (or, more properly, virginal conception) - I hold it to be true but it is not remotely central to Christian faith in the way resurrection is.

I disagree with that, for various reasons that have been well drawn out in discussions before.

But, Bp Spong has had little influence apart from getting media attention and having his books sold in secular bookstores in the part of the world where I live.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

wayseer

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2008
8,226
503
Maryborough, QLD, Australia
✟11,121.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I see him as kind of a Barnum or Bailey sort of fellow. A lot of flash and show, but when you get beyond the smoke and mirrors, it's kinda cheap and sucrose. Does that make sense?

No. I don't see Spong and sickly or sweet - he is too spiritually tough for sugar and spice. And his arguments, although popularize for mass consumption, are theologically supportable.
 
Upvote 0
Nov 5, 2010
266
18
California
✟7,982.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I would have to disagree about the virgin birth (or, more properly, virginal conception) - I hold it to be true but it is not remotely central to Christian faith in the way resurrection is.

The virgin birth is necessary to Christ being God.
 
Upvote 0

TomUK

What would Costanza do?
Supporter
Feb 8, 2004
9,095
397
39
Lancashire, UK
✟39,645.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
The virgin birth is necessary to Christ being God.

Not that i necessarily disagree, but i think when we start down that line of thinking when can very easily end up in the sticky situation Rome has found herself in regarding doctrines of our Lady.

The point that i believe Ebia is making is that while theological implications of the incarnation are important, belief in the virgin birth is not an issue upon which our salvation depends.

Though it's a slippery when you begin to rank doctrines of the Church, the physical resurrection of Christ is profoundly more important than the virginal state of Mary. In that sense they are simply not comparable issues.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cajun Huguenot

Cajun's for Christ
Aug 18, 2004
3,055
293
64
Cajun Country
Visit site
✟4,779.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Unless you are a fundamentalist you have much in common.

If believing the Nicene and Apostles Creeds makes one a fundamentalist, than you are correct.

If you do believe these creeds, as they have been historically understood by Protestant, Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches, than you do have major differences with Bishop Spong.

Kenith
 
Upvote 0

ContraMundum

Messianic Jewish Christian
Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
15,666
2,957
Visit site
✟78,078.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Unless you are a fundamentalist you have much in common.

I am not a fundamentalist (in the sense Spong uses the word) nor do I have anything in common with him, nor do I think his arguments are "theologically supported", sure, logically he can try to make it fly, but theology is not about rationalizing revelation until it becomes palatable to the trends of the day..
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Polycarp1

Born-again Liberal Episcopalian
Sep 4, 2003
9,588
1,669
USA
✟25,875.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
If believing the Nicene and Apostles Creeds makes one a fundamentalist, than you are correct.

If you do believe these creeds, as they have been historically understood by Protestant, Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches, than you do have major differences with Bishop Spong.

Kenith

I take it my posts are to be disregarded in favor of third-party critiques then? I have personally with my own eyes and ears watched Bp. Spong recite the Creed at the Eucharist, and he is not the sort of man to mouth platitudes he does not believe. He may attach different meanings to its statements than you do, but that has been common Anglican practice almost from the beginning -- we share one Cup, not one Credal exegesis.

And while we're sitting in judgment over his theology, might we spare a moment to remember him as a strong fighter for social justice? The evangelical parish in Tarboro were he was rector, who differ with him so strongly that they invited him back for an anniversary celebration after he retird as bishop, certainly recalls him that way. The parish in Jerry Falwell's hometown which had him as rector next certainly does too. And around 10% of Episcopalians know he stood up for them when most church leaders would not.
 
Upvote 0