If you keep my commandments you will abide in my love, said, Jesus. What does that mean?
Jesus teaches to love, so if you continue to love, you will abide in it. God is love.If you keep my commandments you will abide in my love, said, Jesus. What does that mean?
If you keep my commandments you will abide in my love, said, Jesus. What does that mean?
Our Love does grow with use (experiencing God's Love), but can we do anything righteous without first have at least some Godly type Love, which is a gift from God (1 Cor. 13:1-4)I am thinking that abiding in Christ's love is about living in love. One learns what living in Christ's love is and experiences it by obeying Christ's commandments.
Do you think that not obeying his commandments means not abiding in his love?He means exactly what he stated there.
If you keep my commandments you will abide in my love, said, Jesus. What does that mean?
Do you think that not obeying his commandments men's not abiding in his love?
If you keep my commandments you will abide in my love, said, Jesus. What does that mean?
You make a good point here yet I wonder who the "us" might be when the scriptures are read because it is more than obvious that the Law was given through Moses to the people of God with Moses who heard God voice in the mountain and to their descendants. One might argue that Christians are descendants through Jesus Christ and their union with him by faith but if one applies that scriptural line of reasoning one must also accept the other elements in the same line of reasoning which point to the cessation of the law, perhaps referring to the ceremonial laws, and possibly to aspects of the national laws that applied to the ancient state of Israel. If one does that then your statements have considerable merit.The Bible often uses the same terms to describe aspects of the nature of God as it does to describe aspects of the nature of God's law, such as with it being holy, righteous, and good, and it could not accurately be described as such if it were not God's instructions for how to act in accordance with those aspects of His nature. When we express aspects of God's nature through our obedience to His law, such as by doing what is righteous, we are expressing our love for that aspect of who God is, which is why there are many verses in both the OT and the NT that connect our love for God with our obedience to His commandments. So our love for God is not extrinsically related to His commandments such that what God values in obedience in general, but rather it is intrinsically related insofar as everything that He has commanded was specifically commanded for the purpose of teaching us how to love an aspect of His nature.
You make a good point here yet I wonder who the "us" might be when the scriptures are read because it is more than obvious that the Law was given through Moses to the people of God with Moses who heard God voice in the mountain and to their descendants. One might argue that Christians are descendants through Jesus Christ and their union with him by faith but if one applies that scriptural line of reasoning one must also accept the other elements in the same line of reasoning which point to the cessation of the law, perhaps referring to the ceremonial laws, and possibly to aspects of the national laws that applied to the ancient state of Israel. If one does that then your statements have considerable merit.
I see where you went with the ideas from your previous post. I do not agree with the theology expressed in your most recent post.Yes, Galatians 3:26-29 directly connects being children of God through faith in Christ with being children of Abraham, heirs to the promise, and John 8:39, those who are children of Abraham are doing the same things that he did, which was being blessed by repenting from his wickedness and by expressing God's nature through walking in His way in obedience to His law and multiplying his decedents by teaching his children and those of his household how to live blessed lives through following his example in accordance with faith in the promise and spreading the Gospel that was made known in advance to him (Genesis 12:1-5, Genesis 18:19, Genesis 26:4-5, Deuteronomy 30:11-16, Galatians 3:8, Acts 3:25-26).
The only way for there to be a cessation of certain laws is if what they teach us about how to love God's eternal nature is no longer true, which is why all of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160). For example, in 1 Peter 1:16, we are told to have a holy conduct for God is holy, which is a quote from Leviticus where God was giving instructions for how to have a holy conduct, such as keeping God's Sabbaths holy (Leviticus 19:2-3) and refraining from eating unclean animals (Leviticus 11:44-45). So by following God's instructions for how to have a holy conduct for He is holy, we are expressing that holiness is an aspects of God's nature that we love, while those who refuse to follow those instructions are expressing that holiness is an aspect of God's nature that they do not love, which is why Jesus said in John 14:23-24 that those who love him will obey his teachings, those who do not love him will not obey his teachings, and that his teachings are not his own, but that of the Father. The only way that instructions for how to have a holy conduct as God is holy to cease is if God is no longer eternally holy, so those claim that those laws have ceased are denying that He is holy and are bearing false witness against Him by misrepresenting Him as not being holy.
If the authors of the Bible did not hold a concept of the category of ceremonial law that contains exactly the same set of laws as our concept, and the concept of which laws are ceremonial varies widely from person to person, then we would be misunderstanding the Bible by interpreting it as referring to a category that we had created, and any doctrine based off of a category that we had created would be creating our own doctrine, so it is important to establish that we have derived from the Bible an exact set of laws that belong to the category of ceremonial law, however, the Bible never lists that and never even refers to the category of ceremonial law.
There are any numbers of ways that I could categorize God's laws, such as based on which part of the body is most commonly used to obey/disobey it, such as with the law against theft being a hand law, but if I were to create my own doctrine out of a category that I had created, such as saying that hand laws have ceased, then I would be in error. I'm not denying that certain laws can arguably be described as ceremonial, just as certain laws can arguably be described as hand laws, but we should be careful not to create our own doctrine out of categories that we have created that have not been derived from the Bible.
I am unwell today, it must wait until I am feeling better.Please explain why you do not agree.