Clare73
Blood-bought
- Jun 12, 2012
- 25,096
- 6,100
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Red herring. . .Jesus was taking an action as part of a Passover Seder, so that is the context in which what he speaking about should be understood.
In Acts 20:7, it is important to keep in mind that for Jews the day started at sundown, so a meeting on the first day of the week would have began on what we would refer to as Saturday at sundown. Jews have a longstanding tradition of meeting on the first day of the week for a Havdalah service on Saturday at sundown to mark the closing of the Sabbath and to welcome in the work week. Jews also traditionally didn't handle money on the Sabbath, so this was also a time when they would collect offerings (1 Corinthians 16:1-2). So Paul spoke from evening until midnight, not from morning until midnight, and then left on Sunday morning to travel. This does not establish that they met on Sunday morning, and even if they had, it wouldn't establish that this was the start of a new tradition, and even if it was, it wouldn't establish that they hypocritically set aside God's command to keep the Sabbath in order to establish their own tradition, and even if they had, it wouldn't establish that we should follow in their example of sin. In regard to Revelation 1:10, the day of the Lord has a specific meaning in Jewish eschatology that refers to the day that John was seeing in his vision, not to the day of the week that he happened to have his vision.
There is as much supposition there about the NT record as there is about what I stated.
Upvote
0