How do you reconcile the flood and the burning of Sodom with the person of Jesus?
(edit to add: I'm amazing at how controversial it is to suggest that Jesus does not drown 2-year-old children and set them on fire)
edit to add:
A friend wrote this and it makes me think:
Let's say God did send a global good to destroy all evildoers: it is absolutely absurd to say every single person on earth was an evildoer.
What did a newborn do to deserve being killed in the flood? A helpless, sinless, harmless, innocent baby. God drowned her. Why? We're not talking about 'all humanity'. We're talking about this specific individual *baby*. What did *she* do to deserve the merciless wrath of God?
If God killed babies, children, or any other innocent person in a global flood, then God is evil. And the theology which defends the murder of babies is an evil theology.
The ends (all evildoers are dead) do not justify the means (kill every person, including the innocent, in order to kill evildoers). Might does not make right. God does not kill children.
(edit to add: I'm amazing at how controversial it is to suggest that Jesus does not drown 2-year-old children and set them on fire)
edit to add:
A friend wrote this and it makes me think:
Let's say God did send a global good to destroy all evildoers: it is absolutely absurd to say every single person on earth was an evildoer.
What did a newborn do to deserve being killed in the flood? A helpless, sinless, harmless, innocent baby. God drowned her. Why? We're not talking about 'all humanity'. We're talking about this specific individual *baby*. What did *she* do to deserve the merciless wrath of God?
If God killed babies, children, or any other innocent person in a global flood, then God is evil. And the theology which defends the murder of babies is an evil theology.
The ends (all evildoers are dead) do not justify the means (kill every person, including the innocent, in order to kill evildoers). Might does not make right. God does not kill children.
Last edited: