Hi there,
So I just wanted to grasp the polarity of faith in Evolution, from a factual perspective.
As it is: it is more important that a fact, be about a person - than a person, be about facts.
In other words, at some point Evolution has to lay claim to faith, because facts alone are not enough to make theory important.
For example, if I espoused facts about someone all day and all night, eventually I would come to the conclusion that this person had an element of mystery about them.
I would not think they "evolved mystery".
So I just wanted to grasp the polarity of faith in Evolution, from a factual perspective.
As it is: it is more important that a fact, be about a person - than a person, be about facts.
In other words, at some point Evolution has to lay claim to faith, because facts alone are not enough to make theory important.
For example, if I espoused facts about someone all day and all night, eventually I would come to the conclusion that this person had an element of mystery about them.
I would not think they "evolved mystery".