I'm not intending this to be a debate, rather I was thinking about the oft repeated statement that "Islam is a religion of peace" or conversely "Islam is a violent religion"
It occurred to me that in order to make such blanket statements, its necessary to presume that there is a core of "truth" in Islam - i.e. there is a true and objective Islam. Assuming that no-one can read the long dead mind of Mohammed to determine what he really meant, making sweeping assertions about the "true" Islam is almost the same as acknowledging that it is divinely inspired.
I believe that Islam is simply wrong, and that there is no divinely inspired, true version of Islam. So the question of whether Islam is peaceful or violent suddenly loses its objective standard.
The upshot of all this is that:
Regardless, we should be loving our muslim neighbors as individuals and letting them know the gospel so they can come into the true light.
It occurred to me that in order to make such blanket statements, its necessary to presume that there is a core of "truth" in Islam - i.e. there is a true and objective Islam. Assuming that no-one can read the long dead mind of Mohammed to determine what he really meant, making sweeping assertions about the "true" Islam is almost the same as acknowledging that it is divinely inspired.
I believe that Islam is simply wrong, and that there is no divinely inspired, true version of Islam. So the question of whether Islam is peaceful or violent suddenly loses its objective standard.
The upshot of all this is that:
- Some muslims are violent, and when they are violent in the name of Islam, then Islam is violent.
- Some muslims are peaceful, and when they are peaceful in the name of Islam, then Islam is also peaceful.
Regardless, we should be loving our muslim neighbors as individuals and letting them know the gospel so they can come into the true light.