BrightCandle
Well-Known Member
- Sep 2, 2003
- 4,040
- 134
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
flesh99:
The NASB and the ESV are the two most literal translations available today, and here is how they translate Heb. 4:9, "So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God." (NASB), and "So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God."
If you believe that the moral law is not binding then, then by default you cannot sin, because sin is the transgression of the law!
Paul says that all Scripture is profitable for doctrine and reproof. Paul did not say only his writings are profitable for doctrine, yet that is what you base your conclusions on. Do Paul's writings "trump" the words of Jesus, when he said that the law would be standing till heaven and earth pass away?
flesh99, you say that Symes and myself have complicted reasons for our faith, when we are only presenting the Ten Commandments as they were written with the finger of God, how much simpler can you get? Your quotes used in responce to nullify the Ten Commandments are almost all taken from the writings of Paul, who Peter said had written things that are hard to understand. The Ten Commandments are easy to understand, the writings of Paul hard to understand, that is what has gotten you confused, flesh99. It is a whole lot easier to just ask the Lord to write his law on your heart than to argue for the nullifying of God's holy law.
Brooks
The NASB and the ESV are the two most literal translations available today, and here is how they translate Heb. 4:9, "So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God." (NASB), and "So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God."
If you believe that the moral law is not binding then, then by default you cannot sin, because sin is the transgression of the law!
Paul says that all Scripture is profitable for doctrine and reproof. Paul did not say only his writings are profitable for doctrine, yet that is what you base your conclusions on. Do Paul's writings "trump" the words of Jesus, when he said that the law would be standing till heaven and earth pass away?
flesh99, you say that Symes and myself have complicted reasons for our faith, when we are only presenting the Ten Commandments as they were written with the finger of God, how much simpler can you get? Your quotes used in responce to nullify the Ten Commandments are almost all taken from the writings of Paul, who Peter said had written things that are hard to understand. The Ten Commandments are easy to understand, the writings of Paul hard to understand, that is what has gotten you confused, flesh99. It is a whole lot easier to just ask the Lord to write his law on your heart than to argue for the nullifying of God's holy law.
Brooks
Upvote
0