TheSeabass
Well-Known Member
Are you saying everyone who hears the word of God gets faith?
Faith allows you to hear the word of God.....they complete each other.
One has to first hear BEFORE he can have faith Romans 10:14
Upvote
0
Are you saying everyone who hears the word of God gets faith?
Faith allows you to hear the word of God.....they complete each other.
How do you know?I think you would consider yourself saved...yet you remain disobedient to many of Jesus' commandments.
2 Thessalonians 1:8 those that do not obey the gospel will be lost.Ch. Bell
No. Water baptism identify us with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection.
No one can undo, change the bible and it requiring water baptism to be saved, Mark 16:16; John 3:5; Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Cor 1:12-13; Gal 3:27; Eph 5:26; Col 2:12-14; etc etc
(1) NT faith includes baptism:If we are saved by faith, then we are saved by faith when we believe and not when we get baptized. Otherwise, we are not saved by faith. Furthermore, if baptism is necessary for salvation, then anyone who receives Christ on his deathbed in a hospital and who also believes Jesus is God in the flesh, who died and rose from the dead for his sins, etc., would go to hell if he doesn't get baptized before he died. This would mean that we were not justified by faith because if we were, then the person would be saved. Also, if baptism is necessary for salvation, then all babies who die go to hell since they weren't baptized.
John 3:5, "Jesus answered, ‘I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.'"
Some say that water here means baptism, but that is unlikely since Christian baptism hadn't yet been instituted. If this verse did mean baptism, then the only kind that it could have been at that point was the baptism of repentance administered by John the Baptist (Mark 1:4). If that is so, then baptism is not necessary for salvation because the baptism of repentance is no longer practiced.
It is my opinion that the water spoken of here means the water of the womb referring to the natural birth process. Jesus said in verse three that Nicodemus needed to be born "again." This meant that he had been born once--through his mother's womb. Nicodemus responds with a statement about how he cannot enter again into his mother's womb to be born. Then Jesus says that he must be born of water and the Spirit. Then in verse 6 He says that "flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit." The context seems to be discussing the contrast between the natural and the spiritual birth. Water, therefore, could easily be interpreted there to mean the natural birth process.
I would like to add that there are scholars who agree with the position and some who do not. Some believe that the water refers to the Word of God, the Bible; and others claim it means the Holy Spirit. You decide for yourself.
PropheticTimes said:Acts 2:38, "Peter replied, ‘Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.‘"
This verse is often used to say that baptism is part of salvation, but we know from other scriptures that it is not, lest there be a contradiction. What is going on here is simply that repentance and forgiveness of sins are connected. In the Greek, "repent" is in the plural and so is "your" of "your sins." They are meant to be understood as being related to each other. It is like saying, "All of you repent, each of you get baptized, and all of you will receive forgiveness." Repentance is a mark of salvation because it is granted by God (2 Tim. 2:25) and is given to believers only. In this context, only the regenerated, repentant person is to be baptized. Baptism is the manifestation of the repentance, that gift from God, that is the sign of the circumcised heart. That is why it says, "repent and be baptized."
Also, please notice that there is no mention of faith in Acts 2:38. If this verse is a description of what is necessary for salvation, then why is faith not mentioned? Simply saying it is implied isn't good enough. Peter is not teaching a formula for salvation but for covenant obedience, which is why the next verse says that the promise is for their children as well.
ProphecticTimes said:1 Pet. 3:21, "and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also--not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ."
This is the only verse that says that baptism saves, but the NIV translation of the verse is unfortunate. A better translation is found in the NASB which says, "and corresponding to that, baptism now saves you." The key word in this section is the Greek antitupon. It means "copy," "type," "corresponding to," "a thing resembling another," "its counterpart," etc. Baptism is a representation, a copy, a type of something else. The question is "Of what is it a type?" or "Baptism corresponds to what?" The answer is found in the previous verse, verse 20: "who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water. 21And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you." (NASB).
Some think that the baptism corresponds to the Ark because it was the Ark that saved them--not the floodwaters. This is a possibility, but one of the problems is that this interpretation does not seem to stand grammatically since the antecedent of Baptism is most probably in reference to the water--not the Ark.
But, water did not save Noah. This is why Peter excludes the issue of water baptism being the thing that saves us because he says, "not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God." Peter says that it is not the application of water that saves us but a pledge of the good conscience. Therefore, baptism here most probably represents the breaking away of the old sinful life and entrance into the new life with Christ--in the same way that the flood waters in Noah's time was the destruction of the sinful way and, once through it, known as entering into the new way. Also, Peter says that the baptism is an appeal of a good conscience before God. Notice that this is dealing with faith. It seems that Peter is defining real baptism as the act of faith.
PropheticTimes said:Acts 22:16, "And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name."
Is the washing away of sins done by baptism, the representation of the circumcised heart (Col. 2:11-12) which means you are already saved; or is it by the blood of Christ (Heb. 9:14; Rom. 5:9; Eph. 1:7)? Obviously, it is the blood of Jesus, and the washing here refers to the calling on Jesus' name.
Rom. 6:4, "We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life."
Because the believer is so closely united to Christ, it is said that the symbol of baptism is our death, burial, and resurrection. Obviously, we did not die--unless, of course, it is a figurative usage. And that is what it is here. The figure of baptism represents the reality of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection. It is a covenant sign for us. Remember, a covenant sign represents the covenant. The covenant sign of baptism represents the covenant of grace which is that covenant between God and the Christian where we receive the grace of God through the person of Christ by means of his sacrifice.
PropheticTimes said:Titus 3:5, "he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit."
The washing of rebirth can only be that washing of the blood of Christ that cleanses us. It is not the symbol that saves but the reality. The reality is the blood of Christ.
PropheticTimes said:Gal. 3:27, "for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ."
This is speaking of the believer's union with Christ. It is an identification with, a joining to, a proclamation of loyalty to, etc. In 1 Cor. 10:2 the Israelites were baptized into Moses. That means they were closely identified with him and his purpose. The same thing is meant here.
Yes, baptism is necessary to salvation, but not water baptism - Spirit baptism. I would suggest you pray to the Father about this because you are off the path, my friend.
No one can undo, change the bible and it requiring water baptism to be saved, Mark 16:16; John 3:5; Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Cor 1:12-13; Gal 3:27; Eph 5:26; Col 2:12-14; etc etc
The commandment has more to do with disciplemakers then it does converts. No you don't need it but you don't need a marriage ceremony to be married, but chances are, your going to want one.The Bible presents scripture which mention salvation... and baptism with water isn't mentioned.
John 3:16 is perhaps the most famous....“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.....no mention of water.
Same with Acts 2:21....And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.’
Romans 10:13. For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
NOTICE.....no mention of water baptism. None. If water baptism is so essential for one's salvation...why is it omitted?
Chap. Bell
We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, and without any works.
Seymore Bell said:GOD doesn't need any help (Baptism) to secure our salvation. HE secured our salvation 2,000
years ago on Mt. Calvary Cross. When Christ cried out in a loud voice: "It is finished." Meaning salvation is completely secured, void any work coming from mankind.
Salvation always proceed baptism. Meaning you are saved prior to Baptism.
1. The Scriptures you quoted have nothing to do with baptism as a necessary to one's salvation.
2. Lastly, You should always debate the issue at hand, not the debater. This is not Christ like!
All born again believers can say: "For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit." (1 Corinthians 12.13)Yes, baptism is necessary to salvation, but not water baptism - Spirit baptism. I would suggest you pray to the Father about this because you are off the path, my friend.
But no Bible verse says anything remotely to this. This maybe man's philosophy but has no biblical basis.
--God chose water baptism as the point where sins would be remitted, man over the centuries has tried to change that.
--when Christ said "It is finished" He was referring to His work He was sent to earth to do. John 6:27 Jesus said to WORK for the meat that endures unto everlasting life No work - no everlasting life.
--verses as Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38 have the order of baptism BEFORE salvation/remission of sins
--why did you make the personal attack against me instead of dealing with the issue at hand?
My position is and always will be if one is not water baptized for the remission of sins he cannot be saved as the bible teaches...regardless of how one feels about it. My faith is not so shallow that I will change it on a whim over how other people feel. Besides, you failed to prove that water baptism is not essential, so there is no reason for me to change what I believe.There was no personal attack on my end. I felt attacked when you stated in a roundabout way that I am unsaved. My very personal and intimate walk with Jesus proves your interpretation of Scripture to be wrong. My point was that you should perhaps not be so quick to tell one of God's children who has the Holy Spirit dwelling in them that they are unsaved. I am certain that the Lord will take that up with you at a later date.
Blessings!
My position is and always will be if one is not water baptized for the remission of sins he cannot be saved as the bible teaches...regardless of how one feels about it. My faith is not so shallow that I will change it on a whim over how other people feel. Besides, you failed to prove that water baptism is not essential, so there is no reason for me to change what I believe.
I can easily say you attacked me with your denial of the necessity of water baptism...that a two way street. This is how it goes on forums as this.