The church is the new jerusalem and we are the new isreal other than that i see no connection between my post and yours
mea kulpa,
1. What scripture are you basing the church being the New Jerusalem on?
2. Galatians 4:22-25; is about the allegory of the Old Covenant at Sinai and the New Covenant of the Jerusalem from above which free and which is the mother of us all.
This just means that salvation is from God above where Christ rules from for souls that are saved.
Christians are not the physical Jerusalem in this passage.
3. Hebrews 12:22; but ye are come unto Mt. Sion and unto the city of the living God, the Heavenly Jerusalem and to an innumerable company of angels. Some use this but it says no thing. It speaks of the physical city of Jerusalem.
4. Revelation 21:2; And I John saw the Holy City, New Jerusalem coming down from God out of Heaven prepared as a bride adored for her husband.
This is the physical Holy City coming down. Prepared as a bride adorned from her husband is the occupants living inside who are the saints.
21:10; the great city, the physical Holy Jerusalem descends out of Heaven from God.
5. Revelation 21:10-26 is all about the physical Heavenly Jerusalem.
It is addressed to the lambs wife which are the heavenly saints which will be at the Marriage of the Lamb.
6. Romans 2:17-24 talks about the physical spiritual Jews are those Jews who are saved not physical Jews who don't believe.
Verse 25; circumcision profited Jews that kept the law. If the Jews broke the law their physical circumcision is made uncircumcision which is sin. This is because if you keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all James 2:10.
7. Verse 26; if the uncircumcision (Gentiles) keeper has the righteousness of the law shall not his uncircumcision be counted for Circumcision which was a sign of the covenant of law a shadow of salvation.
8. Acts 10:34-35 shows God is no respecter of persons and will accept anyone that worketh righteousness. This context was about Cornelius the Gentile being saved.
9. Verse 27; in circumcision is by nature (because of Adam's sin) if the sinner fulfills the law judge thee who by the letter (law) and circumcision (believers) doth transgress the law?
10. Verse 28; for he is not a Jew which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh. Keeping the law outwardly or circumcision under the law is no requirement for salvation anymore.
11. Verse 29; But he is a Jew (physical) which is one inwardly, is that of the heart, in the Spirit and not in the letter whose praise is not of men but of God.
12. The context is to the physical Jew and the real physical Jew is one inwardly and who is saved.
The uncircumcision are unbelieving Gentiles not the Church.
13. In the Old Testament unbelieving Gentiles were the uncircumcision and they had to be proselyted into Judaism as the stranger at the gate. For those who was in other nations could keep the law and still be saved for God is no respect of persons.
14. In Ezekiel 18 was the same thing. God would save the wicked if they asked for God to forgive them and the Jews didn't like that.
15. At the same time, they thought they were in the club because of being God's chosen nation, thought it unfair for God not to save them if they didn't ask for forgiveness of their sin. God is no respect of persons.
16. Colossians 3:11 says there is no Jew, no Greek, nor circumcision or uncircumcision etc. for Christ is all in all.
Jews were called circumcision and Gentiles the uncircumcision. If they mean nothing because they are both in Christ why would they be called a spiritual Jew.
17. Galatians 6:16; Israel of God is separate from; and as many as walk according to this rule which are both new creatures.
Then it declares peace be upon them and mercy and upon the Israel of God.
There are some who believe that Galatians was a part of the Hebrew letter verse 11: you see how large a letter I have written with my own hand. If this is true this would show that Paul would have been the Author of Hebrews and appear to be a writing for the Jews to understand the contrast of the Jews and Gentiles, circumcision and uncircumcision don't matter in the New Covenant. Hebrews is about the contrast of the Old and New Covenants and the reason the New had to replace the Old.
18. So Romans 2 is not really talking about the Gentiles being a spiritual Jew in its context.
19. If one elevates the olive tree of Jews as the natural branches and the wild olive tree of Gentiles who were grafted in and then who could be saved then maybe a gentile could claim to be a spiritual Jew.
20. Since spiritually there is no circumcision or uncircumcision in the body of Christ then it makes no sense for the Gentiles to be called a Spiritual Jew. Jerry kelso