Is the Seventh Day Adventist Church orthodox

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,243
✟48,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
more bible please... The Bible is filled with examples of prophets that did not write scripture - Nathan, Anna, Agabus, the Christians in 1 Cor 14... etc.
True. But we know they were prophets because the Bible says they were. They also prophesied before the canon was closed (before the NT scriptures were written and collected). How do we know that such prophets speak today? If they perform miraculous signs and foretell future events I’m willing to give them a hearing.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Most SDA will disassociate themselves from anyone that leaves the denomination and joins another denomination or church outside of the SDA.
No, that's another adventist group called the Jehovah Witnesses.(if you become a JW and then leave, no one is allowed to talk to you, and must burn any letters from you without reading them - even if family.)

However, since the SDA has gone under the cult radar of evangelical churches for decades, questioning their orthodoxy may open up a can of worms that questions the orthodoxy of all post reformation traditions.

Though most groups don't hold to one prophet like the SDA, the doctrinal statements that emphasize out the priority matters in the gospel for their own tradition could be doing the exact same thing since testimony and prophecy are tied together in the New Covenant writings.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Not to disrespect you, but just by how you detailed everything. You have not entered a real debate with an experienced JW or Mormon. They do use the Bible and it's verses.
Very true, although in the case of the JW, it's usually their own version of the Bible.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cis.jd
Upvote 0

KingsK.H.R.R.S

Holy, Righteous, Ratchet Squad
Mar 12, 2021
73
65
Oregon
✟18,451.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
With all due respect, there is mention of the Saturday sabbath, Col 2:13-16, also regarding foods, Acts 10:11-15. Mathew 15:11-18

I’m sorry, friend, I am confused by the verses you have cited. Maybe you meant Col 2: 16-18 where Paul a Jew says “let nobody pass judgement on you with questions on food or drink or festival or new moon or sabbath.” Acts also in its most literal sense does away with food laws for followers of Christ, but in context it’s about the inclusion of Gentiles into the family of God. The Matthew verses again is Jesus saying the food laws aren’t the end all be all.

It seems that your message agrees with me that following food laws and Sabbath requirements aren’t a requirement for Gentile believers in Christ and are a matter of conscious. Unless I misunderstood something?
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Most SDA will not become involved with other Christian denominations.
This is refuted by the fact that many SDAs on CF get involved in discussion with other christian denominations all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobRyan
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
more bible please... The Bible is filled with examples of prophets that did not write scripture - Nathan, Anna, Agabus, the Christians in 1 Cor 14... etc.

True. But we know they were prophets because the Bible says they were.

There is not one single Bible text that says that the test of a prophet is "does the Bible say they are a prophet" - imagine if in Acts 17:11 instead of "they studied the scriptures to see if those things are so" the text had said "they studied the scriptures to see if Paul was listed as a prophet in the OT".

That is not a method of testing or Bible study ever endorsed in the Bible. The test of a prophet according to the Bible is not anywhere near that.

They also prophesied before the canon was closed

There were no "canon is closed" statements in the Bible and what is more neither Nathan, nor Anna, nor Agabus wrote a single word in the Canon but they were already affirmed to be accepted as prophets on the very first mentlon of their name in scripture.

More Bible facts please... you seem to be looking for a rule and not yet finding one that works in scripture.


How do we know that such prophets speak today?

We read the Bible and see what it says about that subject. So far you are not referring to a single text of scripture to say what we are supposed to do to determine that.

If they perform miraculous signs and foretell future events I’m willing to give them a hearing.

Not only does no text of scripture say that is the test to see if someone is a prophet - but 1 Cor 12 explicitly and specifically rejects the test you just suggested.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
RBPerry said:
Most SDA will not become involved with other Christian denominations.

This is refuted by the fact that many SDAs on CF get involved in discussion with other christian denominations all the time.

True that happens all the time and so also the cases where SDAs attend other churches as visitors , invite visitors to attend our own churches and in fact Adventist pastors do speak at other churches when invited.

So a lot of off-the-cuff ideas or speculation do not turn out to be thoroughly supported by the facts of history - but it is interesting to see the ideas that some folks do have.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
This is refuted by the fact that many SDAs on CF get involved in discussion with other christian denominations all the time.
But if what was meant was that the SDA church, not individual members, is cool to the idea of engaging in cooperative efforts, both civic and ecumenical, with other Christian denominations, that would be correct.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
If what is meant there is that the SDA church, not individual members, is cool to the idea of engaging in cooperative efforts, both civic and ecumenical, with other Christian denominations, that's correct.
In practice, other groups are similar in not wanting to be ecumenical or co-operative.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
In practice, other groups are similar in not wanting to be ecumenical or co-operative.
Some are, many are not.

If we're talking about the SDA, that church is basically uninterested in participating in inter-church projects.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Some are, many are not.

If we're talking about the SDA, that church is basically uninterested in participating in inter-church projects.
Steeples lack mobility that individuals have in general regardless of tradition.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
RBPerry said:
With all due respect, there is mention of the Saturday sabbath, Col 2:13-16, also regarding foods, Acts 10:11-15. Mathew 15:11-18
I’m sorry, friend, I am confused by the verses you have cited. Maybe you meant Col 2: 16-18 where Paul a Jew says “let nobody pass judgement on you with questions on food or drink or festival or new moon or sabbath.”

Indeed. Matt 7 "Judge not that you be not judged" is a pre-cross rule that still applies in the NT according to Col 2:16. But since you added vs 18 -- lets quote through 22 - to see that what is being condemned in Col 2 - is not only the judging-others problem that Christ condemned in Matt 7, but it is also condemning "making stuff up" -- ie man-made-traditions just as Christ did in Mark 7:6-13

16 Therefore, no one is to act as your judge in regard to food and drink, or in respect to a festival or a new moon, or a Sabbath day— 17 things which are only a shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. 18 Take care that no one keeps defrauding you of your prize by delighting in humility and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding firmly to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God.
20 If you have died with Christ to the elementary principles of the world, why, as if you were living in the world, do you submit yourself to decrees, such as, 21 “Do not handle, do not taste, do not touch!” 22 (which all refer to things destined to perish with use)—in accordance with the commandments and teachings of man?

================

Acts also in its most literal sense does away with food laws for followers of Christ, but in context it’s about the inclusion of Gentiles into the family of God.

1. Acts 10 reminds us that even as late as that date - Peter was not eating rat sandwiches. (instead of the wild claim that he was doing such things as a result of following Christ).

2. Acts 10 and 11 remind us that when Peter reports the vision and explains it to others -- not once is the lesson "so now we can eat rat sandwiches" -- instead it is also the message "call no MAN unclean" -- not "call no RAT unclean".


Mathew 15:11-18 and Mark 7:6-13 provide the same message about eating "bread" with hands that have not been "baptized" to wash sin off of them.

The Matthew verses again is Jesus saying the food laws aren’t the end all be all.

Not true at all since there were no food laws saying not to eat wheat or bread if your hands were not baptized or the pots and plates were not baptized.

Hmm lets actually read the text and get some Bible details.

================

Mark 7
The Pharisees and some of the scribes *gathered to Him after they came from Jerusalem, 2 and saw that some of His disciples were eating their bread with unholy hands, that is, unwashed. 3 (For the Pharisees and all the other Jews do not eat unless they carefully wash their hands, thereby holding firmly to the tradition of the elders; 4 and when they come from the marketplace, they do not eat unless they completely cleanse themselves; and there are many other things which they have received as traditions to firmly hold, such as the washing of cups, pitchers, and copper pots.)

So there we see that these are specifically man-made-traditions of the Jews not at all in scripture - and they deal with purifying themselves, their hands their pots to cleanse from sin after coming "from the marketplace" (read -- contact with gentiles).


5 And the Pharisees and the scribes *asked Him, “Why do Your disciples not walk in accordance with the tradition of the elders, but eat their bread with unholy hands?” 6 But He said to them, “Rightly did Isaiah prophesy about you hypocrites, as it is written:


‘This people honors Me with their lips,
But their heart is far away from Me.
7 And in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.

8 Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.”
9 He was also saying to them, “You are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition. 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘The one who speaks evil of father or mother, is certainly to be put to death’; 11 but you say, ‘If a person says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is, given to God),’ 12 you no longer allow him to do anything for his father or his mother; 13 thereby invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that.”

Instead of Jesus teaching "ignore the commandment of God after all it is nothing more than -- Moses said" what Jesus said is - their man-made-traditions where what should be ignored.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Michael Collum said:
This is refuted by the fact that many SDAs on CF get involved in discussion with other christian denominations all the time.

True that happens all the time and so also the cases where SDAs attend other churches as visitors , invite visitors to attend our own churches and in fact Adventist pastors do speak at other churches when invited.

If we're talking about the SDA, that church is basically uninterested in participating in inter-church projects.

Do tell. One wonders where you get your news.

The Seventh Day Adventist Church is not part of the World Council of Churches. We have what we call observer status. I'm invited to events and I work with them personally. I was even part of the writing committee at the Busan General Assembly few years ago. We collaborate and we partner, but the Seventh Day Adventist Church has chosen, for freedom of conscience purposes, not to belong to an ecumenical entity with a central organization, because belonging to such a central organization is like surrendering one's constitutional conscience. This may be why the Catholic Church, for example, while having very close and cordial relationships, cannot be under the umbrella of another organization. We position ourselves in a similar way.

However, just to be clear, in some countries, the Seventh Day Adventist Church is part of, for example, the Protestant World Federation or similar organizations. France and Spain are such cases, because the government deals directly with these entities that include Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Muslims, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Steeples lack mobility that individuals have in general regardless of tradition.
There is little evidence of that, either, if we're still talking about the SDA.

But go ahead and check out who is participating in the inter-denominational community projects in your own town. See if the SDA people are prominent in the ranks. Or not.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
However, in following the mosaic law after the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the writer of Galatians says this means Christ died in vain.

Jesus became the basis of the new covenant, replacing the function of the law.

Because He indwells us, the old way of learning is obsolete, since His presence overwrites the table of our heart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RBPerry
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
However, in following the mosaic law after the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the writer of Galatians says this means Christ died in vain.

Not correct -- one may choose not to take God's name in vain even after becoming a Christian

And Paul affirms the moral law of God which also includes the Ten that have the 5th commandment as "the first commandment with a promise" Eph 6:1-2

Jesus became the basis of the new covenant, replacing the function of the law.

That works better as a direct quote from scripture rather than an ad hoc statement
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,268.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Jesus became the basis of the new covenant, replacing the function of the law.

Because He indwells us, the old way of learning is obsolete, since His presence overwrites the table of our heart.

Gal 1:6-9 - there is only one Gospel
Gal 3:8 that Gospel was preached to Abraham

The New Covenant of Jer 31:31-34 is that Gospel

And it is unchanged in the NT according to Heb 8:6-12
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Not correct -- one may choose not to take God's name in vain even after becoming a Christian

And Paul affirms the moral law of God which also includes the Ten that have the 5th commandment as "the first commandment with a promise" Eph 6:1-2



That works better as a direct quote from scripture rather than an ad hoc statement
Strawman.

I was actually discussing the methodology of knowing what is right and wrong. Not what is right and wrong.

i.e. learning from the Holy Spirit instead of only the written text.

The Holy Spirit is supposed to be the primary guide into all truth.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,056
3,767
✟290,134.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
They certainty seem to depart from historic Orthodoxy in their embrace of certain Ideas/practices. The emphasis on the Sabbath is clearly Jewish in origin, as is their practice of eating Kosher. These things alone perhaps keep SDA from being fully regarded by most Christians, Catholic, Orthodox or even Protestant.

Do SDA even agree with the Nicene/Trinitarian theology of the historic Church?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
28,368
7,745
Canada
✟722,024.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Gal 1:6-9 - there is only one Gospel
Gal 3:8 that Gospel was preached to Abraham

The New Covenant of Jer 31:31-34 is that Gospel

And it is unchanged in the NT according to Heb 8:6-12
I agree there is only one gospel, which one gospel should we believe then, there are a lot of denominations you know.
 
Upvote 0