I really do wish at least some of you would research catholicism before pass judgement on your own ill researched and poor caricature of it.
I will not address all the points that are made on this thread. Many are just silly.
Most I have already addressed over the time, multiple times on multiple threads on multiple forums even.
But let us for example address one you ridicule. "Queen of Heaven"
Which is not a theologically important title such as "mother of God" and it is not a title which is emphasised in the catechism.
But it still has biblical foundation, which is why catholics sometimes give her that honorary title.
First the facts.
Fact 1/ Jesus did all he could, indeed scripture does all it can to identify Jesus as a davidic king. Too many references to mention, including being heralded as such at the annunciation!. Why? because he wants contemporary jews to understand his statements and actions in those terms.
Fact 2/ He also performs actions which align him to davidic kings and solomons times in particular.
Take - riding on a donkey - a direct reference back to david and solomon. Check it out.
Fact 3/ The "queen" of a davidic kingdom was not the spouse. It was the mother of the king. Numerous are mentioned in the OT, because the mothers are queen.
Historical fact.
Fact 4/ What is the power of the queen in a davidic kingdom?
Precisely NONE it is an honorary title reflecting being mother of a davidic king, but they DO have powers of intercession and as we are told in 1 kings 2 - solomon (a davidic king, which as we have seen Christ wanted to align himself )
What did solomon do?
- He gave her throne.
- He bowed to her.
- Most important - he said "make your request my mother, for I will not refuse you"
Now read the above again. Just in case you missed it.
he said 1 kings 2:20 "make your request my mother, for I will not refuse you"
Fact 5/ So the intercession by a davidic queen, to persuade the king to do what she wishes is a biblical fact!
We see intercession in action at Cana. But jesus tells Mary her request is too soon " what have you to do with me, my time has not yet come", but he honoured it none the less with a miracle: water into wine..
Fact 6/ So what is christs kingdom? It is heaven itself.
So what is an appropriate title for his mother with powers of intercession?
"Queen of Heaven" - in keeping with the old testament and structure of a davidic kingdom.
So please.
Spare us the silly stuff about "pagan" it is nothing of the sort.
It is the inevitable conclusion from understanding davidic kingdoms and Christs aligning himself to them.
And for all the other "anti catholic nonsense" - I can produce a similar underpinning. But why should I bother? YOu are all so illinformed about catholicism. And even when I post the biblical defence, the same nonsense will appear a few posts further on, it always does. Straight out of the "100 anticatholic myth playbook", that many of you seem to share. It is all the stuff I had to wade through from my own protestant and evangelical background, to discover the catholic church kept getting it right, but only if you take the time and trouble to understand what it really thinks, and why it thinks it, which has little to do with the "usual caricatures and myths"
In summary. Mary is not God.
Catholics do not consider her so.
But she is a davidic queen with powers of intercession therefore.
Earning the (purely honorary , but theologicially unimportant) title Queen of Heaven So thats why we ask her to "pray for us" and intercede for us.
Just for reinforcement read the writings of church fathers who chose your new testament and wrote your creed. St Ephraim writings for example was vociferous in support of the intercession of Mary! If you do not trust the judgement of those fathers, you have no bible or creed either!
Simples
I've heard all of the above explanations and reasoning countless times before. None of it gives any justification to what the Catholic Church has done with Mary.
Actually, I think she'd be horrified to know (if she was able) what is done in her name and all the unbiblical honour and claims made about her.
Calling her "blessed" does not equal what the Catholic Church does. As you also quoted, Mary acknowledged that she was in need of a Saviour. Catholics may excuse this by saying, "we do not worship her, we 'venerate' her." Actually there is very little difference between the two words, they can often be used synonymously. Most importantly, however, if you honestly consider (in light of Scripture) what is actually said and done in Catholicism in regard to Mary, there remains no doubt that she is very much worshipped.
Also, as I demonstrated from Scripture, those titles she is given are idolatrous and "Queen of Heaven" goes back to ancient paganism and goddess worship. Why do you suppose that such things are permissible now when the Bible is clear that God entirely condemns such practices?
Those pictures are very clear. Nothing in them is Biblical in any way.
If believing the Bible over traditions of man makes me a "radical", then I suppose I am one.
God bless.