Desire does not equate to fulfillment of desire. God created us as sexual creatures, but He places clearly defined limits on our sexual behaviour. The fact that we have sexual desires/appetites/expectations, shows only that we were created with the capacity to engage in and enjoy sexual relationships:
Genesis 2:18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."
So what does that mean in terms of our sexual desires? They are intended to help us in our relationship with our spouse. If it is not good for man to be alone, then how do you harmonise masturbation with this passage?
Although a nice excuse, hormones do not actually cause a response which involves prolonged voluntary physical activity.
Whether or not something is a sin is not determined by your needs. God defines what is sinful and what is righteous.
There is a cognitive part of the brain which is stimulated when we experience sexual desire or sexual arousal. You may have convinced yourself that your brain is not engaged when you touch (and that it therefore does not involve lust), but it is. That same part of the brain is stimulated whether or not our sexual desire or arousal results in sexual gratification. The issue is how we respond to that desire or arousal.
To experience sexual desire is not a sin since it is not a sin to be tempted:
Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we areyet was without sin.
But to submit to that temptation - to pursue temptation rather than pursuing righteousness - is a sin. There is not a sound medical argument for masturbation (eg. "you need a release"), nor is there anything in Scripture to indicate that it is acceptable or indeed a mute point. Indeed, Paul says:
1 Corinthians 7:9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
yet Paul advocated abstinence from marriage for the purpose of serving God more effectively. If Paul, who was such a strong advocate of celibacy, said it was better to marry than to burn with passion (or desire), then where does the notion that there is a better option come from? We should not just be trying to think about this in terms of an issue of righteousness (ie. whether or not it is sinful), but as an issue of wisdom: is it what is most pleasing to God? We aren't called to do the bare minimum for God, he calls us to serve Him with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength - rather than arguing about whether or not you can get away with masturbation, consider whether it is what is most pleasing to God:
Romans 12:1 Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to Godthis is your spiritual act of worship
Genesis 2:18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."
So what does that mean in terms of our sexual desires? They are intended to help us in our relationship with our spouse. If it is not good for man to be alone, then how do you harmonise masturbation with this passage?
mhatten said:more often than not it is our body's hromones kicking in, especially in the case of young men.
Although a nice excuse, hormones do not actually cause a response which involves prolonged voluntary physical activity.
My drive has moderated so I could shout with the best of you that "masturbation is a sin" because my needs have changed.
Whether or not something is a sin is not determined by your needs. God defines what is sinful and what is righteous.
mhatten said:The deisre can come from sexual thoughts it does not have to
There is a cognitive part of the brain which is stimulated when we experience sexual desire or sexual arousal. You may have convinced yourself that your brain is not engaged when you touch (and that it therefore does not involve lust), but it is. That same part of the brain is stimulated whether or not our sexual desire or arousal results in sexual gratification. The issue is how we respond to that desire or arousal.
To experience sexual desire is not a sin since it is not a sin to be tempted:
Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we areyet was without sin.
But to submit to that temptation - to pursue temptation rather than pursuing righteousness - is a sin. There is not a sound medical argument for masturbation (eg. "you need a release"), nor is there anything in Scripture to indicate that it is acceptable or indeed a mute point. Indeed, Paul says:
1 Corinthians 7:9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
yet Paul advocated abstinence from marriage for the purpose of serving God more effectively. If Paul, who was such a strong advocate of celibacy, said it was better to marry than to burn with passion (or desire), then where does the notion that there is a better option come from? We should not just be trying to think about this in terms of an issue of righteousness (ie. whether or not it is sinful), but as an issue of wisdom: is it what is most pleasing to God? We aren't called to do the bare minimum for God, he calls us to serve Him with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength - rather than arguing about whether or not you can get away with masturbation, consider whether it is what is most pleasing to God:
Romans 12:1 Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God's mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to Godthis is your spiritual act of worship
Upvote
0