Now that the "mainstream" media has been caught in yet another lie, is anyone finally angry enough with them to get them to stop the propaganda once and for all???
SourceForty-one percent of all respondents, for instance, agreed that ''Saddam Hussein helped plan and support the hijackers who attacked the US on 9/11." This interpretation persists even after Cheney, in his debate with Democratic rival John Edwards, denied ever suggesting such a thing.
In addition, 38 percent believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when the US invaded, despite the conclusion of the Iraq Survey Group that none existed.
BlessedMan said:I wonder why everyone now wonders who moved the cache of munitions before we got there, but still doesn't find it plausible that someone could have moved WMD's before we got there.
What??? I guess i'm confused...didn't Powell et others go to the U.N., the congress, the nation with evidence of WMD's that we've now deemed "inacurate" because we haven't found them there. I'm just suggesting that maybe they were there afterall and possibly were moved...it's at least possible based on these munitions disappearing.crazyfingers said:It was very clear during the entire runup to the war that Bush/Cheney et al were not presenting evidence that WMDs existed. Why should I assume that they existed without evidence that they did?
BlessedMan said:What??? I guess i'm confused...didn't Powell et others go to the U.N., the congress, the nation with evidence of WMD's that we've now deemed "inacurate" because we haven't found them there. I'm just suggesting that maybe they were there afterall and possibly were moved...it's at least possible based on these munitions disappearing.
Can I get an example of the lying please?ForeRunner said:Nope, it is because the CIA has leaked the original documents after the administration blamed them for faulty intelligence. These documents show that the Bush administration misrepresented and even lied about the intelligence the CIA gave them.
BlessedMan said:What??? I guess i'm confused...didn't Powell et others go to the U.N., the congress, the nation with evidence of WMD's that we've now deemed "inacurate" because we haven't found them there. I'm just suggesting that maybe they were there afterall and possibly were moved...it's at least possible based on these munitions disappearing.
But the thought needs to be reversed...we came to the conclusion that a lot of the evidence that Powell presented was wrong BECAUSE we haven't found the weapons. I think this now hurts Kerry by bringing up the fact that actually were weapons there that have gone missing...the question is how many more, what were they and where did they go?crazyfingers said:Sure it's possible that despite the lack of evidence, that they were there and were moved. But why believe that they were there if all of the "evidence" that Powell presented was wrong?
There needs to be evidence for believing in the first place.
BlessedMan said:Can I get an example of the lying please?
BlessedMan said:But the thought needs to be reversed...we came to the conclusion that a lot of the evidence that Powell presented was wrong BECAUSE we haven't found the weapons. I think this now hurts Kerry by bringing up the fact that actually were weapons there that have gone missing...the question is how many more, what were they and where did they go?
well goes back to Kerry's plan as well. They will do anything or say anything to get a foothold back in washington. they are just mad that the country pulled out their liberal canidates because they are tired of liberalism.dittomonkey911 said:Now that the "mainstream" media has been caught in yet another lie, is anyone finally angry enough with them to get them to stop the propaganda once and for all???
And there were quite a few people in the CIA as well as John F. Kerry that did believe he had WMD's...ForeRunner said:The point is, that they misrepresented the CIA intelligence reports at that time. There were quite a few people in the CIA, and also Charles Duelfer testified that they believed Saddam did not possess WMDs.
BlessedMan said:And there were quite a few people in the CIA as well as John F. Kerry that did believe he had WMD's...
Actually Kerry was part of the Senate Intelligence committee that got briefings directly from the Pentagon...not from GWB.ForeRunner said:The evidence was far from conclusive and certainly not justification for this war. John Kerry relied on the intelligence given to him by the executive branch.
BlessedMan said:Actually Kerry was part of the Senate Intelligence committee that got briefings directly from the Pentagon...not from GWB.