- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,351
- 10,606
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis Ph.D Nobel prize winner: Had this view of Fauci and this question for Fauci -
1:14 min:sec into the video Mullis asks the question about the elephant in the living room about Fauci's CDC graphs showing exponential infection rates.
==================================
Given that background - recall that at some point in Jan 2021 - the CDC "changed" the way we declare something to be a COVID-19 infection so they could finally dump the vast majority of false positives -- but they only allowed that "corrected-process" for reporting on someone who already HAD the Vaccine. Those who were being tested that had not had the vaccine would still be using the old corrupted known-to-be-flawed method with all of its false positives.
So then.. Miracle of Miracles -- the Feb 2021 numbers started to plummet the more people that got vaccinated were included in that new-cases testing number.
View attachment 301565
Source: Where U.S. coronavirus cases are on the rise
====================================
So then -- why don't they apply same standard for what is or is not a COVID-19 infection to the Vaccinated AND the non-vaccindated groups -- for last year??
It would clear some of this fog they introduced - and then all could see how much that changed the results. We could see the level-playing-field comparison- (or maybe that's "the point" of not doing it?)
1:14 min:sec into the video Mullis asks the question about the elephant in the living room about Fauci's CDC graphs showing exponential infection rates.
==================================
Given that background - recall that at some point in Jan 2021 - the CDC "changed" the way we declare something to be a COVID-19 infection so they could finally dump the vast majority of false positives -- but they only allowed that "corrected-process" for reporting on someone who already HAD the Vaccine. Those who were being tested that had not had the vaccine would still be using the old corrupted known-to-be-flawed method with all of its false positives.
So then.. Miracle of Miracles -- the Feb 2021 numbers started to plummet the more people that got vaccinated were included in that new-cases testing number.
View attachment 301565
Source: Where U.S. coronavirus cases are on the rise
====================================
So then -- why don't they apply same standard for what is or is not a COVID-19 infection to the Vaccinated AND the non-vaccindated groups -- for last year??
It would clear some of this fog they introduced - and then all could see how much that changed the results. We could see the level-playing-field comparison- (or maybe that's "the point" of not doing it?)
Last edited: