- Oct 13, 2016
- 5,811
- 3,982
- 23
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
This week Australia listened to an investigative report on one of our most Elite Private schools. A catholic run school that has fronted our national headlines for all the wrong reasons.
It started with the schools promotion of a noxious culture that fostered the boys competitiveness and dominance at competitive events, but spilled into the social arena - sounds dull? Well imagine you're an elderly lady and the tram that's crowded with these private school lads, acting with extreme misogyny
Imagine your a fourteen year old girl in the midst of these boys, sexually harangued. Its worse when the school itself, fostered the culture as opposed to educating against it. Understand that many of these boys will, as adults, be the leadership of our nation in both business and public life.
BUT IT GETS WORSE:
The schools running coach was convicted of child sexual grooming of a pupil. The school headmaster, upon the coach's conviction, wrote a glowing reference of support for the paedophile, for the court which was read as part of the paedophile's sentencing process. In the interim too, the Dean of Sports at that school also wrote a glowing reference to enable the paedophile to find alternative employment.
There was no support for the boy during the gruelling period of police reporting, and subsequent court hearing processes.
Indeed when he later met with the Dean of Sport for the school, the Dean commented that the whole thing was a storm in a tea cup.
Well that storm is now a category one Cyclone.
Full report:
Whats this thread about? :
While this case is yet again another current Catholic child abuse case, showing a seemingly lack of progression on these issues, This is not about Catholicism but rather Institutional Child Sexual Abuse. This is about how institutions still respond in a manner that:
a) lacks transparency
b) Aims to protect the institution's reputation and risk of litigation
c) Fails to provide full and open support to the victims who are children, and vulnerable.
It highlights to me there is a failure in sexual abuse risk minimisation. It is a fact of life that males in positions of power over children, impose higher risks, and far more women need to be employed, or strategies in place where men cannot act in isolation with children.
My intent of this thread is to call upon those with influence to ensure you never act in the interest of your church or other organisation, over the interests of those who your organisation has failed to protect- particularly children.
It started with the schools promotion of a noxious culture that fostered the boys competitiveness and dominance at competitive events, but spilled into the social arena - sounds dull? Well imagine you're an elderly lady and the tram that's crowded with these private school lads, acting with extreme misogyny
Imagine your a fourteen year old girl in the midst of these boys, sexually harangued. Its worse when the school itself, fostered the culture as opposed to educating against it. Understand that many of these boys will, as adults, be the leadership of our nation in both business and public life.
BUT IT GETS WORSE:
The schools running coach was convicted of child sexual grooming of a pupil. The school headmaster, upon the coach's conviction, wrote a glowing reference of support for the paedophile, for the court which was read as part of the paedophile's sentencing process. In the interim too, the Dean of Sports at that school also wrote a glowing reference to enable the paedophile to find alternative employment.
There was no support for the boy during the gruelling period of police reporting, and subsequent court hearing processes.
Indeed when he later met with the Dean of Sport for the school, the Dean commented that the whole thing was a storm in a tea cup.
Well that storm is now a category one Cyclone.
Full report:
Whats this thread about? :
While this case is yet again another current Catholic child abuse case, showing a seemingly lack of progression on these issues, This is not about Catholicism but rather Institutional Child Sexual Abuse. This is about how institutions still respond in a manner that:
a) lacks transparency
b) Aims to protect the institution's reputation and risk of litigation
c) Fails to provide full and open support to the victims who are children, and vulnerable.
It highlights to me there is a failure in sexual abuse risk minimisation. It is a fact of life that males in positions of power over children, impose higher risks, and far more women need to be employed, or strategies in place where men cannot act in isolation with children.
My intent of this thread is to call upon those with influence to ensure you never act in the interest of your church or other organisation, over the interests of those who your organisation has failed to protect- particularly children.
Last edited: