While I agree, he is very focussed on addressing the behaviour of the girl.
I think the issue raised by @Ana the Ist is why relevant facts are apparently being excluded from media reports.
Upvote
0
While I agree, he is very focussed on addressing the behaviour of the girl.
How are those facts relevant?...outside of the context of victim culpability?I think the issue raised by @Ana the Ist is why relevant facts are apparently being excluded from media reports.
How are those facts relevant?...outside of the context of victim culpability?
How are those facts relevant?...outside of the context of victim culpability?
As we've seen in this thread the left-wing narrative is "innocent teen girl killed by incel"
What's particularly disturbing is that the whole "incel" thing is increasingly looking like it was made up, purely to to demonise a specific group of people.
Because the killer is an incel and implicates a wider subculture of individuals, the tactic is to deflect and imply she brought it on herself. Someone did that earlier in the thread, it's about smearing the victim to make it seem like her death is somehow her fault. It's a disgusting attitude.How are those facts relevant?...outside of the context of victim culpability?
How is this different from the rape victim wearing a miniskirt?Many left-wing groups nowadays refuse to accept the prospect that victims of an offense may have engaged in actions that put themselves in danger of having it happen to them; this is especially the case in male - on - female sexual assault and murder, as the prospect that the woman may have had anything to do with what happened to her blows too many narratives about victimization and the progressive stack.
As we've seen in this thread the left-wing narrative is "innocent teen girl killed by incel" when the facts in the case are shaping up to be "girl who engaged in risky and possibly even illegal behavior pushed her luck too far and found herself in the middle of a violent love triangle".
it's not made up. Whether the particular label for this guy fits the bill, to call the whole concept made up is really about you not acknowledging their ugly poisonous attitude that gets exposed to vulnerable individuals (the few males who would actually be willing to partake in that themed violence).What's particularly disturbing is that the whole "incel" thing is increasingly looking like it was made up, purely to to demonise a specific group of people.
it's not made up. Whether the particular label for this guy fits the bill, to call the whole concept made up is really about you not acknowledging their ugly poisonous attitude that gets exposed to vulnerable individuals (the few males who would actually be willing to partake in that themed violence).
If I'm not mistaken, that's what happened the night she died. She used her killer for a ride to a concert....and made out with the guy she was meeting there in front of her killer....and then wanted him to be her ride from the concert.
Because the killer is an incel
and implicates a wider subculture of individuals
it's about smearing the victim to make it seem like her death is somehow her fault
it's not made up. Whether the particular label for this guy fits the bill
I think what's there was an attempt to deflect from the language used by incels like "orbit."
I think what's there was an attempt to deflect from the language used by incels like "orbit."
She also admittedly used her "orbiters" for various purposes. She'd use them for drugs, free rides, money, etc. This is the type of predatory behavior that people refer to as "gold digging"....and it's been made easier for younger women through social media apps like premium snapchat. She openly admitted to using guys this way (and many young women see nothing wrong with it and encourage it). If I'm not mistaken, that's what happened the night she died. She used her killer for a ride to a concert....and made out with the guy she was meeting there in front of her killer....and then wanted him to be her ride from the concert.
You're arguing that this person just randomly targeted her and went at it, when we're looking at a situation where a good lawyer can make an "insanity" defense stick and get the kid a mental institution instead of the chair.
Usage of vernaculars can suggest familiarity or relationship with the subculture.The word "orbit" is very, very widely used. Using it shouldn't be used to judge people.
That's like saying "this teenager used a word that gangsters sometimes use, let's lock him up."
So it's 100% the victims fault or...? What percent?Let's... go back to what was said earlier in the thread.
SummerMadness,
Do you, or do you not, feel that behavior such as this could have pushed someone who was already unstable so far as to finally knock them over the edge?
You're arguing that this person just randomly targeted her and went at it, when we're looking at a situation where a good lawyer can make an "insanity" defense stick and get the kid a mental institution instead of the chair.
That's the point of this. The murderer was in an unhealthy relationship with the victim, a relationship where the victim had the power. Reverse the genders, and we'd have folks cheering.