In your opinion, should these 'damaged' Vancouver balloon twisters, allowed to be near your kids?

[Prexioc]

Any person who appears in front of children in any capacity should be at their utmost behaviour regarding their language and their dressing. The reason for this is that there are long-term psychological implications on kids based on whatever they see. Young kids tend to idolize celebrities or people whom they see as role models. It is, therefore, the parent’s responsibility to ensure children are around people with acceptable behaviour in every aspect. Just as skimpily dressed women’s images has an impact on the mind of men in that it encourages men to see these women as objects, the pictures of a performing artist who doesn’t have pants on the mind of children will leave a dent psychologically.

It wouldn't be advisable to allow kids access to these entertainers without proper background knowledge of who they are or were.

See (and hear) for yourself, in this video clip:

or this video:
Scantilily-clad Kids' Balloon Twister and A Self-described Crazy Children's Facepainter

 

[Sketcher]

Should children have not been allowed to watch professional basketball in the 1970's and 80's?

 

[Janet200]

Any person who appears in front of children in any capacity should be at their utmost behaviour regarding their language and their dressing. The reason for this is that there are long-term psychological implications on kids based on whatever they see. Young kids tend to idolize celebrities or people whom they see as role models. It is, therefore, the parent’s responsibility to ensure children are around people with acceptable behaviour in every aspect. Just as skimpily dressed women’s images has an impact on the mind of men in that it encourages men to see these women as objects, the pictures of a performing artist who doesn’t have pants on the mind of children will leave a dent psychologically.

It wouldn't be advisable to allow kids access to these entertainers without proper background knowledge of who they are or were.

See (and hear) for yourself, in this video clip:

or this video:
Scantilily-clad Kids' Balloon Twister and A Self-described Crazy Children's Facepainter

Wow! This is serious. I would wouldn't let my kids access to these people.

 

[Chux7]

Any person who appears in front of children in any capacity should be at their utmost behaviour regarding their language and their dressing. The reason for this is that there are long-term psychological implications on kids based on whatever they see. Young kids tend to idolize celebrities or people whom they see as role models. It is, therefore, the parent’s responsibility to ensure children are around people with acceptable behaviour in every aspect. Just as skimpily dressed women’s images has an impact on the mind of men in that it encourages men to see these women as objects, the pictures of a performing artist who doesn’t have pants on the mind of children will leave a dent psychologically.

It wouldn't be advisable to allow kids access to these entertainers without proper background knowledge of who they are or were.

See (and hear) for yourself, in this video clip:

or this video:
Scantilily-clad Kids' Balloon Twister and A Self-described Crazy Children's Facepainter

In my opinion NO.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

My guess is laundry day.

 

[Amittai]

Funny name of one of those channels - Ru Tube - with funny lettering - which I didn't try!

Exuberant colours, sound and actions are very intense and hook the young and not so young.

I remember I cried when I saw clowns because they looked horrible. I also remember Lulu on the telly when she wasn't much older than me.

Where we're not used to it (most countries) much flesh is very intense.

Also one's "clothing system" is a visual meme for others.

We've been living through weirder times than we admitted.