B
BellaSong
Guest
I've stuck a finger up a lot of bums and got paid for it too
If I didn't get what you meant, that would sound REALLY bad
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've stuck a finger up a lot of bums and got paid for it too
I would agree, but if people are interested people are interested, I would recommend just googling it if you want to know moreWow this thread turned way off topic O_O
Eh...sex before marriage and after marriage....eh..it makes no difference since we fall short....Hi,
This question is directed at christian couples as this is kind of a christian values kinda question...
I just got engaged on Christmas and me and my girlfriends (both saved and unsaved) have been having a debate. The question is: If me and my fiance have sex before our wedding, is it considered fornicating? One side says yes - since there is no legal document acknowledging our union, it's not acknowledged by God. The other side says no - since we've acknowledged each other as husband and wife, God does as well and we don't need to wait for a piece of paper.
I'm also asking from a personal standpoint. Does anyone regret sleeping with their SO before marriage? Does anyone say it didn't make a difference (in the relationship and sex)? Now that you're married, is there anything you would've done differently in this area?
I didn't want to indicate which side I'm on because I don't want it to affect your answers, but I will say that my fiance and I are about pleasing Him first, before ourselves. (I know that gives it away, but oh well)
Thanks for your insight
Have a Happy New Year!
I bet God would say different... what if the person who had sex before marriage died before they got a chance to repent? What would Jesus say to them on judgment day?Eh...sex before marriage and after marriage....eh..it makes no difference since we fall short....
I may be mistaken, but are you saying Christ's blood doesn't cover ALL sin, only the sin repented for before you die?I bet God would say different... what if the person who had sex before marriage died before they got a chance to repent? What would Jesus say to them on judgment day?
"Hi, I'm Jesus. This is judgement day - did you have a good journey?"I bet God would say different... what if the person who had sex before marriage died before they got a chance to repent? What would Jesus say to them on judgment day?
Sin without foreknowledge is one thing, however, practicing sin with the question in mine 'is this sin?' is wrong. As well, of course, the act of sinning knowing it's a sin, even expecting to ask forgiveness, sin is sin, and sin is wrong."Hi, I'm Jesus. This is judgement day - did you have a good journey?"
OR
"So a Christian, a Muslim and a Jew walk into a bar... oh, you've heard that one?"
OR
"Would you like fries with that?"
Seriously, building any theology off what Jesus 'might' say on judgement day is a bit shaky. Jesus was forgiving people on the cross when they didn't even know what they were doing was wrong!!
I'm not saying go have sex to your hearts content, but lets keep marriage in perspective... marriage is a commitment to live together mutually and faithfully.
In some countries, you have to wait months for your wedding to become legal, so couples who have already made a decision to become married move in.
In the past, sometimes formal ceremonies were too expensive... so couples would simply announce they were moving in and do that.
Today, de facto relationships are effectively recognised as marriage for legal purposes. I don't know that everyone's situation is always going to be the same, but if its committed, mutual, and faithful, then its certainly a good start.
That still doesn't answer the point that marriage is defined and understood differently for many people - in the Bible, we've got polygyny (many wives), wives taken by conquest, wives taken by contract, wives who are sisters, daughters, cousins, wives who are slaves, wives who are equals, so on and so forth. There are examples where all of these (some now prohibited, which is probably a good thing) sexual relationships happen without condemnation. But they are there. Values change and shift over time. Definition of marriage shifts over time - the issue is nowhere near as definitive as you are making it out to be.Sin without foreknowledge is one thing, however, practicing sin with the question in mine 'is this sin?' is wrong. As well, of course, the act of sinning knowing it's a sin, even expecting to ask forgiveness, sin is sin, and sin is wrong.
Matthew 7:21-23 tells us exactly what Jesus will say on that day to the sinful:
21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’
We know from what the Word says that pre-marital sex is wrong. To do so is to practice lawlessness.
Yes, Jesus shed all His blood for our forgiveness, and yes, if we obey the Lord then we are covered by the Blood. However, if we practice lawlessness, even after saying a sinner's prayer, we may still find ourselves cast into hell fire.
The Bible says in 2 Peter 2:14 Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless.
There's no doubt that God is merciful, however He has laid down laws that we are to obey. Every human being has faced trials, tests, temptations, however these things are not the sin; acting on these temptations is the sin. Jesus was the example, He said to every temptation of satan, 'No'.... we are to follow His example. Put in a basic way WWJD (What Would Jesus Do?).
We all fail, yes, but we don't have the incapability to refrain from sin. The Bible teaches to flee immorality.
1 Corinthians 6:18
Shun immorality and all sexual looseness [flee from impurity in thought, word, or deed]. Any other sin which a man commits is one outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.
Other translations use the term 'fornication'.
The Bible teaches us these things because sin is literally spiritual death. And as such, Heaven is a place of life, not death... as also the Lake of Fire is known as the 2nd death, where the sinful who followed through with their carnal lusts and desires will face eternal death.
The Kingdom of God is a place for a people separated unto God, who die to there selves, but live to the spiritual ways.
Deuteronomy 14:2
For you are a holy people to the LORD your God, and the LORD has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.
Romans 8:13
For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.
sexual relationships happen without condemnation.
Its alright, I'm not cheering it on, just pointing out the enormous diversity.You can't assume that God approved of it just because the condemnation was not included in the next verse.
Definitely off topic, but my response to that is from Leviticus 18:7 which says The nakedness of your father, which is the nakedness of your mother, you shall not uncover, which if anything is talking to the son and daughter not to uncover the father's nakedness, it's pretty hard to have sex being covered up.Its alright, I'm not cheering it on, just pointing out the enormous diversity.
A minor curiosity, and a little off topic, did you know that Father-Daughter intimacy is the only form of incest missing from the Levitical laws (ie, not expressly prohibited)? Odd (and definitely icky), but true. Interesting, when you consider that Lot fathers two nations through such a union...
As screwed up as our government is with that law, I still hold to my belief that we should submit to our higher authorities like the Bible teaches. However, since you love him, and want to be with him in all these ways, I would just go ahead and get married without your family... I hate that they did something so wrong to you and him, but I still believe that you should get married to be in right standing with what the Bible says.Let me throw my situation into the bathwater.
I got married in November 2004, legally, with a few friends around me.
Three days later we got a phone call saying that my FAMILY had the marriage annulled because my fiance had a disability that they believed would make it impossible for him to be a fit husband (he's autistic).
In that state, if one of the parties was under 21, they could legally do that. Unfortunately, the court agreed with them.
We have been separated by thousands of miles ever since.
So I'm waiting to get married again, until we have the money to do so. We repeat our vows nearly every day. We believe that we are still married. I will get to see him in a couple of weeks, and I know it's not wrong to sleep with him. But my family would freak because since it's no longer "legal" it's no longer right.
That's their view. I have mine.
In our engagement, we decided that the only acceptable reason for a break up would be cheating, just like the only just reason to break up a betrothal. And even though he has nearly died (he had a very severe sickness) and could still die someday from this illness, I have stayed with him. Is this not the heart of marriage?
Wow, what a story. Thanks for sharing - good on you!Let me throw my situation into the bathwater.
I got married in November 2004, legally, with a few friends around me.
Three days later we got a phone call saying that my FAMILY had the marriage annulled because my fiance had a disability that they believed would make it impossible for him to be a fit husband (he's autistic).
In that state, if one of the parties was under 21, they could legally do that. Unfortunately, the court agreed with them.
We have been separated by thousands of miles ever since.
So I'm waiting to get married again, until we have the money to do so. We repeat our vows nearly every day. We believe that we are still married. I will get to see him in a couple of weeks, and I know it's not wrong to sleep with him. But my family would freak because since it's no longer "legal" it's no longer right.
That's their view. I have mine.
In our engagement, we decided that the only acceptable reason for a break up would be cheating, just like the only just reason to break up a betrothal. And even though he has nearly died (he had a very severe sickness) and could still die someday from this illness, I have stayed with him. Is this not the heart of marriage?
As screwed up as our government is with that law, I still hold to my belief that we should submit to our higher authorities like the Bible teaches. However, since you love him, and want to be with him in all these ways, I would just go ahead and get married without your family... I hate that they did something so wrong to you and him, but I still believe that you should get married to be in right standing with what the Bible says.
If you and your (ex) husband split up with only have been married in your hearts, it's splitting up, not divorce, and only people who are married can divorce.
But if you don't take to heart anything I've said so far, please take this to heart... Only go by what the Word of God says on the subject. If you believe the Bible to be the whole Truth, then it should be your guide through this whole situation. Sadly it does take a piece of paper to make one married, and according to the law, you're not married.
It hurts me to hear that you two were split up in this way, but keep in mind that mine, yours, or even your family's opinion doesn't matter, the only one who's opinion does matter is God's.