stevevw
inquisitive
Wow thankyou for your break down, Its a bit over my head though. I agree that String Theory has no scientific verification but it is held up by some as the only possible hope for a theory of everything. I think people relate more to the classical physics as we can see it at work around us at its simplest form. But you lost me at the calculations so maybe you need to explain it in layman terms for me.Lets look at String Theory as an example of something that is actively promoted, seems to offer support for existing theories such as quantum field theory, yet is considered by many in mainstream science to not even being a scientific theory.
Before tackling this issue one needs to go back to classical physics and debunk the notion expressed in this thread that classical physics is built around “common sense” and “intuitiveness”.
Consider the inverse square law for gravity and electrostatics;
For a spherical distribution of masses m or charges q, the maths can be simplified by considering the mass or charge to be concentrated at a point.
This point particle is dimensionless and takes up no space; it is clearly a mathematical construct and has no physical reality.
When Einstein found the equivalence between mass and energy E = mc², the concept of a point particle became problematic as the field around a point particle also contributed to mass.
The mass of the electromagnetic field mₑₘ is defined as;
For a point particle rₑ → 0 and mₑₘ becomes infinitely large.
While this was not an insurmountable problem in quantum mechanics it became a serious issue in quantum field theory which is the application of special relativity to quantum mechanics.
The problem of infinities cropped up in quantum field theories as in classical physics of treating particles as point sources.
A saving grace in most quantum field theories is the concept of renormalization.
In the case of QED (quantum electrodynamics) when charged particles interact with each other they undergo an oscillation which “smears” the charge over a small region of spacetime.
Since the charge is no longer point like, the small scales less than this region of spacetime can be ignored in the calculations.
The infinities disappear at they only occur at these small scales.
QED is known as a renormalizable theory but unfortunately there is no quantum field theory of gravity which is renormalizable; one cannot get rid of the infinities in the calculations.
This is where String Theory comes into the picture.
It adopts many of the principles of quantum field theory with the major exception of point particles which are replaced by vibrating strings at extremely small scales.
Since these strings have a size, quantum gravity is renormalizable in String Theory and a theory of everything where the forces are unified in the early universe becomes possible using String Theory.
So what is the problem with String Theory?
This link provides an excellent explanation.
Why String Theory Is Not A Scientific Theory
Upvote
0