They should be there with "no old age". They are not there so that means old age.dad said:Only in the mind of those who think they should have been there. With no old ages, why should they be? There was no 80 million years ago, why claim there was then invent a missing isotopes case?
The difficulty is with all the other isotopes that should be there and aren't.So, it seems elementary, Pu244 was involved in the former process. (Unless a result of the split process) Where is the difficulty here? Seems simple enough.
You are still not understanding the first thing about the argument are you?It is now produced by decay, in the past it was not, but part of the other process.
We know these isotopes are produced, we know they decay given enough time. We know that enough time has passed that they have decayed away. Your myth is falsified. End of story.So what? The question is not how they are now produced, but we are looking at the past here, how WERE they produced? The answer is, you do not know, plain and simople.
(Various dad-hoc nonsense snipped)
The cold fusion Jones is talking about is the fusion of deterium to produce helium. Jones has worked on muon catalyzed cold fusion for some time. It is not relevant to the fission reactions that occured at Oklo. No one can say anything about a "presplit" fantasy world that only exists in your mind."Neither cold fusion nor cold nucleosynthesis is understood at present, nor are the results yet widely accepted by the scientific community. But as we continue to explore together, cooperative experiments at several laboratories giving positive results cannot be ignored much longer. "
"...Department of Physics and Astronomy of Brigham Young University; Steven Jones is a professor in that department"
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/113jones.html
In other words you indeed cannot say whether cold fusion in a pre split world could have left the fingerprints we see at Oklo, or not! Ha. Interesting. The plot thickens.
You certainly classify as comic relief.No, they are old agers, and really can't do much but try to justify their lack of substance with comic relief attempts, however feeble.
This makes no sense at all but then nothing you post does.Why talk about what it ain't, when I gave you what it likely was? First impact zones of the split process with the information relayed on the still present highway of light between here and there! Thus, the PO explosion we see there, was carried well on it's way to earth. No?
You don't see any problems with depositing thousands of feet of layered sediments with in at least one case millions of varves, and many other features impossible in a short time but then you can delude yourself into thinking there may have been no gravity before the flood so it is not surprising that you don't see huge number of insoluble problems.The only ones deceived are those who omit Him from the creator role in our past. They, in effect, deceive themselves by missing the important part of the picture.
About your little flood remark, with most of the layers being pre flood, no need exists to try to use flood geology to explain them. I don't see any problems whatsoever in this light.
Upvote
0