Because for evolution to start again, you need to go back to the original point of when life was just a simple single celled organism, something that cannot happen.
Adaptations cannot start all over, nor can evolution. It is literally impossible to wipe the slate clean with regards to evolution without removing all life on earth and allowing it to start all over again.
You're just shooting the breeze, as far as I can tell.
All I can hear is "I need the conditions to be absolute" "I need the entire species to try in unison" things which God is capable of, but for which you will not acknowledge Him?
"I need for Evolution to refer to specific set of species, with a specific level of perfection" sounds like "I need to jury-rig something for which there is no evidence, by excluding interference at random"... seriously, how confusing and unpredictable do you need it to be?
Let me ask you something: is Evolution ever going to reach a point, where it venerates the ground on which Darwin walked? The way Hollywood stars get the walk of fame? 'Cause I really don't want to be in a conversation that proves anything goes for someone who finds an exception to the Cross? Jesus' Cross was final, it was for every sin, every sin that was committed in the name of Evolution, every sin that was committed in the name of anything else. There is no way for your readiness to evolve, being above sin and the temptation to sin.
There is no way for something to evolve, to the point that it does not have to struggle with the possibility of sin, does not have to be righteous in a specific way and does not have to face judgment as pertains to the faith behind it. I have tried to understand what Evolution means in terms of righteousness, and all I have been told is that "it has nothing to do with being right", meaning the chastening in the end,
will be the harshest possible, to a point. You want that? You honestly want that?
EDIT: I'm serious. Sins committed in the name of Evolution, are worse than sins that are simply "selfish".
