FreeGrace2
Senior Veteran
- Nov 15, 2012
- 20,401
- 1,703
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
I said this:
"The Bible describes eternal life as a gift of God in Rom 6:23.
The Bible describes the gifts of God as irrevocable in Rom 11:29."
But we all know that Paul NEVER did such a thing. But he DID describe 3 of God's gifts previously within that SAME EPISTLE to the Romans, thus making those 3 gifts of God DIRECT CONTEXT for 11:29.
1. spiritual gifts in 1:11
2. justification in 3:24 and 5:15,16,17
3. eternal life in 6:23
All of these specific gifts are CONTEXT for 11:29.
No one has shown otherwise. Mere claims to the contrary prove nothing.
In fact, the word "gift" doesn't occur anywhere between Rom 6:23 and 11:29.
The only reason to deny that those 3 specifically mentioned gifts of God are context for 11:29 is because one simply doesn't want to believe that eternal life is irrevocable.
It is absurd and irrational to divorce what Paul CALLED gifts of God from what he said about God's gifts in 11;29.
Esp since no one has shown any kind of gift in 11:29 that applies only to Jews.
"The Bible describes eternal life as a gift of God in Rom 6:23.
The Bible describes the gifts of God as irrevocable in Rom 11:29."
Really? Out of context, you claim. Please direct me to ANY verse in ch 11 where Paul describes ANY gift to the Jews. If he did, then ch 11 WOULD be the immediate context for 11:29.Mr. Out-Of-Context, aka Mr. Outside Darkness, quit taking Romans 11 out of context.
But we all know that Paul NEVER did such a thing. But he DID describe 3 of God's gifts previously within that SAME EPISTLE to the Romans, thus making those 3 gifts of God DIRECT CONTEXT for 11:29.
1. spiritual gifts in 1:11
2. justification in 3:24 and 5:15,16,17
3. eternal life in 6:23
All of these specific gifts are CONTEXT for 11:29.
No one has shown otherwise. Mere claims to the contrary prove nothing.
In fact, the word "gift" doesn't occur anywhere between Rom 6:23 and 11:29.
And what verse or passage would lead anyone to that conclusion?? Where did Paul EVER speak of God's mercy to Israel as a gift?The gifts mentioned in Romans 11, are the gifts of mercy to the children of Israel. Get it straight.
You're still not getting it. The issue isn't what you'd like to LIMIT as gifts of God. The issue is WHAT Paul himself described as gifts of God before he penned 11:29. Those 3 gifts (spiritual gifts in 1:11, justification in 3:24 and 5:15,16,17 and eternal life in 6:23) HAVE TO BE context for 11:29, as they are the ONLY GIFTS that Paul mentioned before he penned 11:29.You don't believe seeing, hearing, and speech are gifts from God, because your interpretation of 'irrevocable' gifts won't allow it. Our natural life in our bodies are gifts from God.
The only reason to deny that those 3 specifically mentioned gifts of God are context for 11:29 is because one simply doesn't want to believe that eternal life is irrevocable.
Irrelevant to the letter to the Romans. Paul specifically mentioned 3 of God's gifts and THEN noted that God's gifts are irrevocable.What is life if it isn't a gift from God?
It is absurd and irrational to divorce what Paul CALLED gifts of God from what he said about God's gifts in 11;29.
Esp since no one has shown any kind of gift in 11:29 that applies only to Jews.
Paul wasn't describing loans. Irrelevant to the discussion. Please acknowledge what Paul DID note as gifts of God.A loan you must pay back?
Paul wasn't describing life as a gift. So irrelevant to the discussion. Please acknowledge what Paul DID note as gifts of God.Is life something you earned?
Totally irrelevant and just a smokescreen in order to deflect away from what Paul DID deswcribe as gifts of God in the epistle that tells us that God's gifts are irrevocable.What did you pay for your life? From whom did you buy it?
Upvote
0