- Oct 18, 2021
- 721
- 127
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nor would we trust people in the back pocket of big pharma or etc. When a company tries to suppress records for seventy years, rather than let people see what results are, I would not trust them. When media have shown open bias and censorship, they would lose trust. When people ar caught lying or with vested interests, they would lose some trust. When people support abortion fanatically, for many of us, they have no trust to lose. Etc.That's right. I could say of anyone that I cannot judge their honesty from afar through a YouTube video. That's why I don't rely on such judgements for my epistemology. You apparently do.
Some experts make many interviews and videos. It is not just some random youtube thing. Since they may be threatened with firing or other consequences for doing so, that adds some credibility. So it is a lot of factors and boils down to trust.Seeing a video or listening to people can also give you a sense of how much they support what your already believe, which will in turn color your perception of their honesty. Those who repeat what you want to hear will appear honest to you. Those who challenge your preconceptions will appear smug and with all sorts of yechiness. To wit:
In some cases if they refuse vaxes they get fired. No big mystery. In other cases they were in industries that gagged them, so they would have been unable to remain there if they spoke truth.You can only assume why someone quit their jobs, if indeed they are even telling the truth about quitting their jobs. Check your epistemology.
False. Blind trust in known liars and media promoted snakes is the fallacy.As I explained before, this is circular reasoning. It assumes to be true that which you are trying to prove. It is a fallacy.
I do. Jesus is the truth. The folks who are most like Him get a better chance with me. Those pushing child sacrifices, or ridiculous nazi style agendas and such lose trust with me.That assumes you already know what the truth is.
If you do not know the truth beforehand you are easy prey for the liars and cons. Now the real facts regarding the vaccine agenda are not really fully knowmn. The refusal to release records for many decades for example does not help. The history of drug companies injuring people and being involved in mass lawsuits does not help. The dictatorial bias in mainstream news does not help. The fear mongering and bogus stats do not help. The granting of immunity to companies producing the stuff that injures and kills many people does not help. etc etcUsing this criteria to find the truth is circular reasoning. To break out of circular reasoning one must establish an objective standard for how to know truth (a valid epistemology) that is not dependent on knowing that same truth beforehand.
OKI believe the poster was referencing human behavior. For instance, a person that has made wise decisions in the past is likely to continue doing so and vice versa.
Right. That does not mean everything he ever said was wrong.EX President Trump also said to get vaccinated.
Don't be fooled by the phrase fact checking. The fox cannot guard the hen house.The Right-wing media puts out more unproven facts and opinion pieces than anybody. Conspiracy blogs and sites abound on the right. Very little actual fact-checking. Unless you count "I heard disgruntled employees say what I already believe in my heart so that proves it."
The point from the articles was what you missed. Don't blame me. That does not mean I support all the claims and reasons for the action. It just means, in that case, that things are changing now. The old ways seem not to apply any more for travel restrictions etc. In other words, if the new variant is less serious and spreads far faster, no one can really avoid it by vaccines, not travelling etc.Hi @power1
You really need to work on your reading comprehension. You keep posting articles that have titles that you apparently think support your position, but if you bothered to read them at all, you'd see that they don't,... if you're able to understand what you're reading.
God bless,
Ted
So things are changing. That was the point. Not that some pig headed nations will continue with the agenda or not regardless of anything that happens or changes!Hi again @power1
Israel has lifted some 69 countries which were previously banned for Israelis to fly....TO.
Those countries still carry quarantine restrictions when the flyer returns from them, back to Israel. So no, this article isn't saying anything about Israel thinking that the omicron variant isn't dangerous. They just don't think that their vaccinated citizens who fly to these countries are likely to die or need hospitalization while away from home. What the part you quoted is saying is that once omicron is the dominant variation in Isreal, there will be no epidemiological designation to stop people with it from entering the country, because such a ban as keeping people who might have it from coming to Israel will no longer be effective at keeping the omicron variant out.
The inbound travel restrictions were set in place to hopefully keep the covid and its variants from coming into the country, but once they are already in, and are a dominant condition within Israel, then keeping inbound people our, just altogether, will no longer be effective. But they are still requiring covid vaccination proofs and quarantines for all those who aren't vaccinated or haven't produced a negative test result.
It's all about understanding what one is reading that makes news articles valuable to us.
God bless,
Ted
Just about nearly everything else.Right. That does not mean everything he ever said was wrong.
Abortion too? Voting fraud?Just about nearly everything else.
If you can verify the source, you can pretty much check their fact-checking. It's when people say something and you have no way of verifying the information, it would not be trustworthy.Don't be fooled by the phrase fact checking. The fox cannot guard the hen house.
Where? The opposite is true in some places. The latest variant I think started the the unvaxxed! Should we check that the records won't be released of vaccine issues for many many decades? You doubt that? Also, if a so called fact checker is the same outfit that censors dissenting opinions who would trust that!?If you can verify the source, you can pretty much check their fact-checking. It's when people say something and you have no way of verifying the information, it would not be trustworthy.
What I've noticed id you seem to find a blog or web video that agrees with what you already feel in your heart and you call it facts. No verification or raw data. Unvaccinated people are filling up the ICUs and it's not right.
Yes.Abortion too? Voting fraud?
I don't concurYes.
Your errors are noted.I don't concur
Can you show me one place where the vaccinated are taking up more beds than the unvaccinated? Probably not. How do you know what censors are doing what? I mean besides your gut feeling? Can you show me where fact-checked facts are actually proven wrong? Doubt it.Where? The opposite is true in some places. The latest variant I think started the the unvaxxed! Should we check that the records won't be released of vaccine issues for many many decades? You doubt that? Also, if a so called fact checker is the same outfit that censors dissenting opinions who would trust that!?
Your use of the word errors is notedYour errors are noted.
Can you show me one place where the vaccinated are taking up more beds than the unvaccinated?
No big secret what they censor.Probably not. How do you know what censors are doing what?
Well many people question fact checkersI mean besides your gut feeling? Can you show me where fact-checked facts are actually proven wrong? Doubt it.
In your opinion
You are still wrong.
Because there are many factors besides vaccinations that determine the number of people who get infected.Some almost totally vaccinated countries do get some of the highest sick numbers. Why is that?
Which is the best opinion.In your opinion
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?