The "first-fruits of the harvest" were offered on the 16th day of Nisan, from that fruit which ripened first in Palestine—barley (but see Men. 84a)—and with considerable ceremony, in order to emphasize dissent from the Sadducean interpretation of the Scripture text, "the morrow after the Sabbath" (Lev. xxiii. 11), which is, according to the Sadducees, always Sunday (Men. 65b).
I will say you are making a gross logical error here sister Lulav. You are saying that because the Sadducees were condemned by Christ that everything they do is therefore wrong...this is a huge error as that means by this logic one error in a man or woman makes everything they did before wrong. That is like me saying that because my parents made one error in raising me that they know nothing about parenthood. And your citation above proves that the Pharisees wished to assert their own authority over that of what is clearly stated in scripture. My argument is not based on the reasoning of the Sadducees: it is based on the reading of what's in the Torah.
And you said above you weren't aware of this, that is the Sadducean dating. They interpreted the instructions as the day after the Sabbath to mean the weekly Sabbath, but the Pharisees did not, they determined it to be speaking of the first day of unleavened bread which is also called a Sabbath.
No, I said that I never heard of anyone claiming that the Sadducees were the ones who proclaimed a 364 Day Solar calendar which you implied. I simply took what is written in the Torah and laid it out thoroughly without any bias or appeal to outside authority. Let's keep in mind that Jesus' main attacks on the Pharisees and the Sadducees was not on the law but, their hypocrisy in regards to the law.
I guess I'm not seeing what you are seeing.
David said unto Jonathan, 'Behold, tomorrow is the new moon
Jonathan said to David, 'Tomorrow is the new moon
David hid himself in the field: and when the new moon was come, the king sat him down to eat meat
You Said:
We see above that the understanding between David, Jesse, and king Saul was that there was no need to use the Moon to track the beginning of the months or, the days of the year:
However, at this time there doesn't seem to be a organization under Saul, David was the one who set it up, meaning the priests who would site the moon and other things in the temple. I think they could say Tomorrow is the New moon by observing the sky and seeing the moon disappear and then knowing that the next day it would begin to appear, even just a sliver.
I used the passage above to show that new moon is not being used in the way many force the term on the word month. The passage above shows in context that the new moon was not the physical moon but, the beginning of the
1st Day of the Month. This is solidified further on the third day of David's absence when it says that was also the
2nd Day of the Month.
As for the absence of an organization under Saul: let's keep in mind that the priesthood was established with Aaron which at the time of Saul's reign was ~
400 Years ago. Why Samuel was brought to the priest was he not? And Eli served as the high priest...so I am not sure where you get the idea that there was no priestly setup. And let's not forget that even before the priesthood that from Moses back to Adam: no one had any problems keeping track of the days of the year. The story of Noah proves that the timeframe which passed during the
1 Year and 10 Days on the Ark could only be accomplished and worked out on a solar calendar, not a lunar calendar.
Have you taken into consideration the root word of Chodesh? It is 'cadash' meaning to repair or renew. The month is not renewed, but the moon is. The Sun does not appear that way.
Yes I have considered this and have no qualms about the translation for the Hebrew word for month. Have you noticed that in nature the Sun's light is renewed each morning and extinguished each evening? Each day is the beginning of a new day in which the light of the Sun is renewed, literally, made new again. Limiting the word CHoDeSH to only the Moon is contrary to what we read in
Genesis 1:14-19 where the Sun, Moon and stars are to be for signs, seasons, days, and years; weeks and months are not mentioned because it is understood that they are composed of the total number of days which make up the year. The leader of the day according to God and Moses is the Sun--not the Moon and the stars--as it rules the day and divides it from the night: therefore the Sun is the leader of the months of the year: therefore God's calendar is solar.
I've always contemplated that the calendar set forth by G-d is in regard of his appointed times. This covers Seven months. After that it is not of import to keep tract but to watch for the barley when the appointed times start all over. That is because man can make all kinds of calendars, but the L-RD, even though the moon was put in a cycle, he also controls the weather conditions and will determine when the year starts by having the barley in green ear at that time. Since this determines the rest of his appointed times for that year it cannot be manipulated.
הַחֹ֧דֶשׁ הַזֶּ֛ה לָכֶ֖ם רֹ֣אשׁ חֳדָשִׁ֑ים רִאשֹׁ֥ון הוּא֙ לָכֶ֔ם לְחָדְשֵׁ֖י הַשָּׁנָֽה
This month 'chodesh' is to be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you.
If there were no need for the other five months then please explain why Moses goes through the effort of mentioning the
10th Month in the story of Noah (
Genesis 8:5)? And why do king David and king Solomon bother to setup their officers according to the twelve months of the year (
1 Kings 4:7-18, 1 Chronicles 27:1-15)?
The barley is irrelevant because God clearly tells us through Moses that we track time with the luminaries, not produce. While spring is a good indicator for beginning the new year it alone does not tell us precisely when and where we are in the year if we want to keep track of the appointed times: that is why God instituted a solar calendar which we could easily observe and calculate.
Now I kindly provided my proofs and showed how and why they align with scripture. I also kindly and patiently proved how according to scripture in post #53 the Moon is not the leader of the months in any of its phases. If you would be so kind sister Lulav to point out any error in that for me to correct then I will look over your counterpoints and concede and admit my errors. If you cannot find fault with the evidence I have presented then will you please concede instead of holding onto your pride for the sake of saving face?