As I re-read this post, it becomes VERY evident that I haven't even touched the TIP of the iceburg with my little "commentary". Please don't allow what I have said sway you, it is staggeringly incomplete. I would suggest reading the book!!! (Or, actually, the commentary that IFFY has posted!!
Hello! I recently read the book and Dr. Swanson's insights are very thought-provoking. I'd recommend the book to anyone who is interested in a very logical, scientific and Biblical approach to what the future probably holds. The book (among other things) talks about profusion (the propensity towards "things" - ie: cars, houses, ideas, basically ANYTHING that can be numbered growing larger in number and at a faster rate.)
When we factor in the fallenness of man it presents a pretty bleak picture (from the world's standpoint. I, myself, being a Christian, see these ideas as exciting and hope-filled because I see a culmination of events that will ultimately lead to our departure from the world and eternal life with Christ!)
Dr. Swanson has been asked by others if he sees the progression of man in any way from a positive perspective. He has replied that he difinitely does. There are many great inventions and new ideas being presented that will help mankind in various ways. But, he is quick to point out that the fallenness of man must be factored in. He uses the argument that 100 good things can be completely undone by one bad thing if it's bad enough.
IE: Much effort and care involving hundreds of steps and countless ongoing hours of preservation may go into creating a pond used as natural habitat for fish and waterfowl, but all of that can be undone by one tanker truck filled with toxic chemicals that has an accident and spills its contents into the lake (the accident being the result of living in a fallen world).
I know I'm probably not doing his book justice, Dr. Swanson is not a doomsday prophet or any kind of prophet for that matter. I know some would argue with many of his points, but it's very difficult because he really only uses factual information, nothing ethereal. All I can say is his book is very interesting.