To not consume genetically modified foods you have to live off wild plants, how do you manage that while exercising in modern society?
Eradication of starving to death, how immoral.Things have gone too far, that IS my point among other things. It's all because of the immoral scientists; they offer their services to corrupt politicians.
Eradication of starving to death, how immoral.
I suspect this is being done on poepus.You have gone too far now...
I suspect this is being done on poepus.
ok believer guy, after starting this topic in the debate forum, have you learned anything new..?
Ah my bad, i thought people start threads to find answers to a question. Seems like you had your answer before you started the thread...
A good debate? in your OP you didn't even bother to give an opinion...
[QUOTE="But unfortunately in the context I would argue morality is subiective.
Any thoughts?
Which is why arguments of better morality depend on oratory skills, not necessarily a "better code."
I do believe that everyone has innate in them basic things for which they know is right or wrong. Some would call it the new covenant, some call it "morality," superego... But, you can justify or unjustify any "morality."
Spiritual "morality" is spirituality. That is categorically a different dimension of ethics and morality, because it focuses on how spirits should live in order to be in harmony with God (or, whatever is the highest spiritual paradigm in the spirituality.)
I would call it empathy...
Your question is meaningless ?
Yes.Why is it meaningless?