No, a great scientist is the one who's after a groundbreaking idea. They often endure hardships, as their work involves loneliness (among other things), which causes lack of moral sense, hence the immorality. Even if a small portion of them succeed, they are all the same. Groundbreaking or not.
You still think scientists are like the villain from the Smurfs?No, ''real'' scientists are people known for their eccentricity.
Scientist are bad, Christians are good.Let´s just generously assume, for purposes of your argument, that all great scientists are eccentric, and that being eccentric often means being immoral.
Now what?
Hm, loneliness causes lack of moral sense? I live alone, and I think I have a pretty decent moral compass...
Scientist are bad, Christians are good.
You still think scientists are like the villain from the Smurfs?
Is everything you know about from Saturday morning cartoons?
You still think scientists are like the villain from the Smurfs?
So it's not the loneliness of the scientists that makes them immoral then..? Pls tell us what it is then...
Haha, very hard to tak you serious, so I won't even try...
When it comes to scientists, the thing I am interested in is the quality of their scientific findings. The morality of their private lives, not so much.
I do not think the objective of science is morality but to discover what the world calls "truth". Therefore, I do not think science is moral at all since at its basis there is no morality.Any thoughts?
When you drink a glass of milk, are you very concerned about the morality of the farmers..?
There is a contradiction in reality. In theory, science is a-moral since it should be an objective look at truth, but in practice it is biased and prejudicial. The irony is that modern science began from a moral point of view. The early medieval scientists were Christian theologians who began their pursuit with the assumption that an orderly God created an orderly creation. When Darwin rejected the Creator as his premise and substituted natural selection scientists who preferred to deny God grabbed hold of his substitution. Now that bias prevents many scientists from accepting the premise of God and the influence of a spiritual dimension upon the physical world.Any thoughts?