No it's not. The first sentence is belied by the rest of the post.Neither do I look at the world in terms of black and white.
The difference between criticizing American policy, which Trump did scathingly in this UN address against Obama's pathetic, wimpish deal with Iran, and bashing America, is believing that the path that America has carved out for the world since its Revolution is is the best hope for humanity.
If you do not know that, do not believe that about America, it is indeed not black and white for you either. It is a mish-mash of indeterminate grays, that has neither a yes or a no, a straight line or a goal.
All of the criticism and none of the hope is all there is left.
I will leave you to that.
Is it your contention that anyone who sees Rocket man as a very evil man and a bane to humanity is defining the world in black and white?When you start defining things in terms of 'good guys' and 'bad guys', that's pretty much exactly what you're doing.
Well, I guess I would have gone for the kind of deal that did not involve delivering planes full of cash on a Tehran tramack in the dead of the night.What exactly was so pathetic about the deal? What sort of deal should Obama have gone for? How does getting out of the deal benefit?
America has offered the world an example of a free people choosing their own destiny and successfully thriving and prospering to the extent that no other country in the world history of oppressive government ever has before.What does that even mean? And what right does America have to carve out a path for the rest of the world?
Is it your contention that anyone who sees Rocket man as a very evil man and a bane to humanity is defining the world in black and white?
That is a 'at least the trains were running on time' sort of contention
Well, I guess I would have gone for the kind of deal that did not involve delivering planes full of cash on a Tehran tramack in the dead of the night
Like I say, I will leave you to your quagmire of endless shades of gray.
Which aren't world leaders. We were talking about insulting individual people but, ok. What did he say about Christians and the bible that was so insulting?
You can thank God you're not saying that in German right now.
That doesn't make the Soviet Union any less of an evil that it was.You do know that about 3/4 of German losses in WWII were inflicted by The Soviet Union?
I don't care if Guam took Germany.You do know that about 3/4 of German losses in WWII were inflicted by The Soviet Union?
I don't care if Guam took Germany.
You can thank God we're not all speaking German right now.
Alternately, you could think of Stalin in one of his paranoid rages murdering all of his generals, or sending them to freeze to death in gulags, so that the Third Reich was able to march in for a thousand miles, unopposed, slaughtering the untrained, unled, untrained people armed with pitchforks indiscriminately, until Russian winter stopped the Nazis.Alternatively you could thank the millions of red army soldiers who gave their lives to crush the Third Reich...
And as I understand it, the U.S. could have taken the AYBABTU approach, but held back on purpose and let Russia finish the job because of what Hitler had done to them.
Alternately, you could think of Stalin in one of his paranoid rages murdering all of his generals, or sending them to freeze to death in gulags, so that the Third Reich was able to march in for a thousand miles, unopposed, slaughtering the untrained, unled, untrained people armed with pitchforks indiscriminately, until Russian winter stopped the Nazis.
It really did.It really did not happen quite like that.....
You could too.Alternatively you could thank the millions of red army soldiers who gave their lives to crush the Third Reich...
One ... more ... time.Your understanding is flawed.
Praising the USSR for its role in WWII is like praising Mussolini and Hitler for getting the trains running on time.
Couldn't he stop the war before 6 million or so Jews were needlessly exterminated?Let's give God the credit.