Remission with experimental drugs..Nobody prays for those critters,do you?
Who said anything about drugs? Experimental or otherwise?
I'm talking about
natural remissions. No treatment, no drugs. Just letting the cancer do its thing. Most of the time, it kills the rats.
On some occasions, the rats go into natural remission. Just like humans do on some occasions.
Just because you spoke to yourself (I'm sorry, "prayed") about a person doesn't mean this prayer triggered a remission or triggered some unsupported deity to use magic to make the tumor dissappear.
Natural remissions do happen. In humans and non-humans. With or without prayer.
So assuming you agree that your diety of choice won't bother to reach into the DNA of a labrat that nobody is praying for to cure it from its cancer, this means that you accept that natural remissions of cancer do occur.
Now for the million dollar question:
How do you tell the difference between a
natural remission and a
supernatural cure?
That question,I can not answer
You can't answer the question about why labrats go into remission, but somehow, you are able to answer the question about why humans go into remission? How does this make sense?
Is something that really happened an anecdote?
Anecdotal:
based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation: anecdotal evidence.
It's an anecdote because it's unverifiable. It's undocument. There's no systematic evaluation of the story or the claimed events. You expect us to take your word for it. But you could be wrong. You could have falsely interpreted what happened. The person with cancer could have been lying oabout having cancer. The original diagnose could have been wrong, perhaps she never had cancer. You could be lying about the whole thing.
See, this is the problem with anecdotal stuff. We are expected to "just believe you". Take your word for it. Accept it at face value.
I have no problem "just believing you" for rather mundane claims... like for example if you would have an anecdote saying
"I went to McDonalds yesterday and had a burger. There were 3 people in front of me and one of them had a small dog. After eating the burger I went home and watched a movie".
McDonalds exists. People frequent it. It sells burgers. People keep dogs. People watch movies.
There's nothing there raising any kind of red flag.
Now, if you would add the following to this anecdote:
"I noticed in McDonalds that I forgot my wallet. I prayed to my god of choice for some money and His glorious self then turned the dog into solid gold. I broke of one of the ears and used it to pay my burger".
Now, LOTS of red flags are coming up.
Now, your anecdote is no longer something I can just accept at face value.
See?
Maybe it's not impressive to you,but to her family and those whose lives she touches everyday,it sure is impressive..go mock someone else's healing,she does not deserve it.
I'm not mocking her healing. I'm glad she went into remission (if the story is true). What I'm mocking is all the rest you are adding to it.
And you didn't address the 2 most important parts of my post:
1. what about all the people being prayed for that die a horrible death instead of being "healed"?
2. what about all the very similar anecdotes, told by followers of rivalling religions in support of
their religion?