House Intel finds no collusion between Trump campaign and Russia

[Mountainmanbob]

Who would have ever known?
MB

 

[mark kennedy]

Who would have ever known?
MB

Yea they decided to take the party line without even telling the Democrats on the committee. No partisanship here to see, move along.

 

[Kentonio]

This is great. Nunes will no longer have any excuse to interfere with Mueller’s work.

 

[Mountainmanbob]

For 18 months we've been hearing about this Russian Trump connection.

It all turned out to be fake news.

Surprise surprise.

To no a veil they will try to
bring a great President down.

M-Bob

 

[mark kennedy]

It doesn't matter, no one really thought the House and Senate investigations would get to the bottom of this. People like Bannon simply refused to say anything, what did they do about it, nothing. That's why you need a special prosecutor and trust me, it's a very different thing in front of the grand jury. I honestly don't think that collusion is what happened but what has happened since is another story.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

For 18 months we've been hearing about this Russian Trump connection.

It all turned out to be fake news.

Given that there are multiple investigations still ongoing, this would seem a bit premature.

 

[Tanj]

The sieve is finally out of water. Hooray. Now the grown ups can complete the real investigation.

 

[evoeth]

Giuliani is now admitting that the campaign may have colluded with Russia but Trump didn't know about it .

I guess we can now dismiss Nunes for leading a farce of an investigation and reopen the investigation under Schiff.

 

[whatbogsends]

Who would've thunk that Nunez, who had been caught leaking information about their "investigaton" to Trump would have led a partisan fake investigation to attempt to clear Trump's name.

It's almost as if the facts don't seem to care that Putin said very strongly that there was no collusion.

 

[Mountainmanbob]

It's almost as if the facts don't seem to care that Putin said very strongly that there was no collusion.

The goats take Putin's word on that one. He probably knows more than we think?
M-Bob

 

[cow451]

The goats take Putin's word on that one. He probably knows more than we think?
M-Bob

Yes, Putin knows a lot about Mr. Trump, LOL

 

[Mountainmanbob]

Yes, Putin knows a lot about Mr. Trump, LOL

It's a big Bromance according to those on the left.

Once again they will be proven in the end to be ridiculous.

When will they ever kick into gear so as to make America great again?

Maybe they just don't have it in them?

M-Bob

 

[mark kennedy]

Yes, Putin knows a lot about Mr. Trump, LOL

Well Putin had better be careful around this guy, if he gives you a 'that a boy', check to see if you still have your wallet.

 

[rambot]

When will they ever kick into gear so as to make America great again?
M-Bob

What does that mean?

 

[cow451]

What does that mean?

T

 

[EpiscipalMe]

It's a big Bromance according to those on the left.

It is not necessarily a bromance.

 

[Michael]

I suspect the new Democratic house will reach a different conclusion, particularly after Manafort's lawyer leaked the fact that Manafort handed sensitive Republican polling data over to the Russians during the campaign. Holy cow. Any Trump supporter want to explain how that's not collusion?

 

[EpiscipalMe]

I suspect the new Democratic house will reach a different conclusion, particularly after Manafort's lawyer leaked the fact that Manafort handed sensitive Republican polling data over to the Russians during the campaign. Holy cow. Any Trump supporter want to explain how that's not collusion?

It is not collusion because of Benghazi, emails, and Uranium One.

 

[mark kennedy]

I suspect the new Democratic house will reach a different conclusion, particularly after Manafort's lawyer leaked the fact that Manafort handed sensitive Republican polling data over to the Russians during the campaign. Holy cow. Any Trump supporter want to explain how that's not collusion?

We still don't know what is in the Manafort redactions, I thought evidence in a criminal trial was supposed to be a matter of public record. There is nothing to redact if it doesn't involve ongoing investigations...does it?

 

[Michael]

We still don't know what is in the Manafort redactions, I thought evidence in a criminal trial was supposed to be a matter of public record. There is nothing to redact if it doesn't involve ongoing investigations...does it?

I believe that you're right about the reason for the attempted (and botched) redactions. As I understand it however, it was possible to read all of the redacted parts of that one document because Manafort's lawyer didn't redact it properly. It was evidently a matter of simply copying and pasting the redacted parts to be able to see the redacted text.

I'm trying to wait for the special counsel's report before passing judgement, but I really don't see how anyone can ignore the fact that Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman and he was handing internal and sensitive Republican polling data over to the Russians. Meanwhile the Republican party was changing the Republican platform to favor Russia. That's pretty much the definition of collusion with a foreign government, a foreign government that was actively engaged in trying to influence the outcome of the election.

Yikes.