Tinyarch
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't call an essay that nobody knows about a fundamental paper.
Then why is it that if this is such a fundamental and important paper for the LGBT community, why can't I find any sources from them and their supporters that talk about it? The book on the other hand, After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ‘90s, was read in the 90s and some groups adopted the public relations recommendations such as "look good" "raise funds" with the entire goal to be accepted as regular people, is by far from a "gay agenda", it's public relations, every organization in the world does that.
Are you dense?
Ask yourself why the LGBTQ organizations would stay quiet on a paper that outlined the approach they would take to change the minds of an entire nation.
Second, the book you refer to promotes a similar approach to what Madsen and Kirk outlined in the 1980's. They are compatible.
Just admit there is an agenda instead of looking for a weak excuse with no merit.
Upvote
0