Hermeneutical framework of Covenant Theology vs New Covenant Theology

[mkgal1]

This topic came up in another thread, and in order to not derail that thread, I wanted to discuss this here.

These labels and their distinctions are new to me (and maybe to others as well).

This is what's written of the traditional Covenant Theology (and maybe protestant reformed Covenant Theology may differ from this).

Taken from Wiki
Covenantal theology is distinctive in its emphasis of the following tenets:

• The biblical covenants (Edenic, Adamic, Noahite, Abrahamic, Mosaic, Davidic, and New or Messianic) are taken to be the chief structural framework for salvation history.
• The Abrahamic covenant (as distinct from the Mosaic) is taken to be the central Old Testament covenant that is fulfilled in the New Testament, in accordance with Pauline theology (Galatians 3:6-29).
• The Old and New Testaments are taken to be integrally related through the sequence of covenants, with prophetic fulfillment understood chiefly in terms of covenantal correspondence.
• Scripture is interpreted via the four senses, with an emphasis on describing the correspondence between covenants via the allegorical sense.
• Jesus' prophecy in the Olivet Discourse is understood to have been fulfilled by the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 AD.
• Old Testament prophecy of a restoration of Israel in which Jews and Gentiles are united is understood to have been fulfilled in the Church, cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church 781 drawing on Lumen Gentium 9.
• Jesus is understood to have inaugurated the Kingdom of God, which advances throughout history from the Ascension to the Last Judgment, cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church 669-670.
• The advance of the Kingdom of God throughout history is interpreted in terms of the Augustinian concepts of the City of God and the City of Man.
• *************************

Let's discuss.....

 

[mkgal1]